Pianta Robert C, Hamre Bridget K
Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, USA.
New Dir Youth Dev. 2009 Spring;2009(121):33-46. doi: 10.1002/yd.295.
The National Research Council's (NRC) statement and description of features of settings that have value for positive youth development have been of great importance in shifting discourse toward creating programs that capitalize on youth motivations toward competence and connections with others. This assets-based approach to promote development is consistent with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) framework for measuring and improving the quality of teacher-student interactions in classroom settings. This chapter highlights the similarities between the CLASS and NRC systems and describes the CLASS as a tool for standardized measurement and improvement of classrooms and their effects on children. It argues that the next important steps to be taken in extending the CLASS and NRC frameworks involve reengineering assessments of teacher and classroom quality and professional development around observations of teachers' performance. This might include using observations in policies regarding teacher quality or a "highly effective teacher" that may emanate from the reauthorization of No Child Left Behind and moving away from a course or workshop mode of professional development to one that ties supports directly to teachers' practices in classroom settings.
美国国家研究委员会(NRC)关于对青少年积极发展具有价值的环境特征的声明和描述,对于将讨论转向创建利用青少年追求能力以及与他人建立联系的动机的项目而言极为重要。这种基于资产促进发展的方法与用于衡量和提高课堂环境中师生互动质量的课堂评估评分系统(CLASS)框架相一致。本章着重介绍了CLASS和NRC系统之间的相似之处,并将CLASS描述为一种用于标准化测量和改善课堂及其对儿童影响的工具。本章认为,在扩展CLASS和NRC框架方面接下来要采取的重要步骤包括围绕对教师表现的观察重新设计教师和课堂质量评估以及专业发展。这可能包括在有关教师质量的政策或可能源自《不让一个孩子掉队法》重新授权的“高效教师”政策中使用观察结果,并从课程或工作坊式的专业发展模式转向直接将支持与教师在课堂环境中的实践相联系的模式。