Albert R E
Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, OH 45267.
Environ Health Perspect. 1991 May;92:91-2. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919291.
Although hexavalent chromium is well established as a human carcinogen by the inhalation route, there are significant uncertainties in the quantitative estimation of cancer risk. One of the important uncertainties is the assumption that the carcinogenic potency, determined under conditions of occupational exposure where most workers were cigarette smokers, applies to the nonsmoking individual in the general population. There is substantial evidence that carcinogenicity is a function of the rate of cell turnover in the target tissue. The chromate worker would be expected to have a relatively high rate of cell proliferation in the bronchial mucosa due to airborne irritants and smoking. The potency of chromium might therefore be relatively high under conditions of occupational exposure. This problem in quantitative risk assessment applies equally well to another important indoor pollutant, radon.
尽管六价铬通过吸入途径已被确认为人类致癌物,但在癌症风险的定量评估中仍存在重大不确定性。重要的不确定性之一是这样一种假设,即在大多数工人为吸烟者的职业暴露条件下确定的致癌效力适用于一般人群中的非吸烟者。有大量证据表明,致癌性是靶组织细胞更新率的函数。由于空气中的刺激物和吸烟,预计铬酸盐工人支气管黏膜中的细胞增殖率相对较高。因此,在职业暴露条件下,铬的致癌效力可能相对较高。这种定量风险评估中的问题同样适用于另一种重要的室内污染物——氡。