Norseth T
Environ Health Perspect. 1981 Aug;40:121-30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8140121.
The carcinogenicity of chromium compounds is reviewed with specific attention to the gaps in knowledge for risk estimation and research needs. The most important problems at present are whether trivalent chromium compounds cause cancer, and whether there is a difference in cancer causing effects between the soluble and the slightly soluble hexavalent compounds in the practical exposure situation. Dose estimates for risk estimation based on epidemiological investigations are also lacking. Present evidence indicates that the trivalent chromium compounds do not cause cancer although high concentrations in some in vitro systems have shown genetic toxicity. Hexavalent chromium compounds cause cancer in humans, in experimental animals and exert genetic toxicity in bacteria and in mammalian cells in vitro. Epidemiological evidence and animal experiments indicate that the slightly soluble hexavalent salts are the most potent carcinogens, but proper identification and characterization of exposure patterns in epidemiological work are lacking. Workers also tend to have mixed exposures. Soluble and slightly soluble salts are equally potent genotoxic agents in vitro. Further work for establishing dose estimates for risk evaluation in epidemiological work is important. In vitro systems should be applied for further identification of the mechanism of the carcinogenic effects, and animal experiments are urgent for comparison of the carcinogenic potency of the different hexavalent salts. Hexavalent chromium salts must be regarded as established carcinogens, and proper action should be taken in all industries with regard to such exposure. At present the carcinogenic risk to the general population caused by chromium compounds seems to be negligible, chromium in cigarettes, however, is an uncertainty in this respect. The amount of chromium and the type of chromium compounds inhaled from cigarettes is not known.
本文综述了铬化合物的致癌性,特别关注风险评估知识方面的空白和研究需求。目前最重要的问题是三价铬化合物是否致癌,以及在实际暴露情况下,可溶性和微溶性六价铬化合物在致癌作用上是否存在差异。基于流行病学调查的风险评估剂量估计也很缺乏。现有证据表明,三价铬化合物不会致癌,尽管在一些体外系统中高浓度时显示出遗传毒性。六价铬化合物在人类、实验动物中会致癌,并在细菌和体外哺乳动物细胞中产生遗传毒性。流行病学证据和动物实验表明,微溶性六价盐是最有效的致癌物,但在流行病学工作中缺乏对暴露模式的正确识别和特征描述。工人往往会有混合暴露情况。可溶性和微溶性盐在体外同样是有效的基因毒性剂。在流行病学工作中进一步开展确定风险评估剂量估计的工作很重要。应应用体外系统进一步确定致癌作用的机制,动物实验对于比较不同六价盐的致癌效力也很迫切。六价铬盐必须被视为已确定的致癌物,所有行业都应针对此类暴露采取适当行动。目前,铬化合物对一般人群造成的致癌风险似乎可以忽略不计,然而,香烟中的铬在这方面存在不确定性。从香烟中吸入的铬的量以及铬化合物的类型尚不清楚。