Lee Sin Hang, Vigliotti Veronica S, Pappu Suri
Department of Pathology, Milford Hospital, Milford, Connecticut, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Apr 9;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-8.
Laboratory detection of Human papillomavirus (HPV), Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology specimens is now based on identification of the DNA sequences unique to these infectious agents. However, current commercial test kits rely on nucleotide probe hybridization to determine DNA sequences, which may lead to diagnostic errors due to cross-reactivity. The aim of this study was to find a practical approach to perform automated Sanger DNA sequencing in clinical laboratories for validation of the DNA tests for these three infectious agents.
A crude proteinase K digest of 5% of the cells collected in a liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology specimen was used for the detection of DNA molecules specific for HPV, C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae, and for preparation of materials suitable for direct automated DNA sequencing. Several sets of commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were used to prepare nested PCR amplicons for direct DNA sequencing.
Some variants of HPV-16 and HPV-31 were found to share an at least 34-base long sequence homology downstream of the GP5+ binding site, and all HPV-6 and HPV-11 variants shared an upstream 34-base sequence including part of the GP5+ primer. Accurate HPV genotyping frequently required more than 34-bases for sequence alignments to distinguish some of the HPV genotype variants with closely related sequences in this L1 gene hypervariable region. Using the automated Sanger DNA sequencing method for parallel comparative studies on split samples and to retest the residues of samples previously tested positive for C trachomatis and/or for N gonorrhoeae, we also found false-negative and false-positive results as reported by two commercial nucleic acid test kits.
Identification of a signature DNA sequence by the automated Sanger method is useful for validation of HPV genotyping and for molecular testing of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in liquid-based cervicovaginal Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology specimens for clinical laboratories with experience in molecular biology to increase the specificity of these DNA-based tests. However, even a highly specific test for high-risk HPV genotyping may have unacceptably low positive predictive values for precancer lesion in populations with a low cervical cancer prevalence rate.
目前,液基宫颈阴道细胞学标本中人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的实验室检测是基于对这些感染因子独特DNA序列的鉴定。然而,当前的商业检测试剂盒依靠核苷酸探针杂交来确定DNA序列,这可能因交叉反应导致诊断错误。本研究的目的是找到一种在临床实验室中进行自动化桑格DNA测序的实用方法,以验证针对这三种感染因子的DNA检测。
将液基宫颈阴道细胞学标本中收集的5%细胞进行粗蛋白酶K消化,用于检测HPV、沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌特异的DNA分子,并制备适合直接自动化DNA测序的材料。使用几套市售的聚合酶链反应(PCR)引物制备用于直接DNA测序的巢式PCR扩增子。
发现HPV-16和HPV-31的一些变体在GP5 +结合位点下游共享至少34个碱基长的序列同源性,并且所有HPV-6和HPV-11变体共享包括部分GP5 +引物的上游34个碱基序列。准确的HPV基因分型通常需要超过34个碱基进行序列比对,以区分该L1基因高变区中一些具有密切相关序列的HPV基因型变体。使用自动化桑格DNA测序方法对分割样本进行平行比较研究,并对先前检测沙眼衣原体和/或淋病奈瑟菌呈阳性的样本残留物进行重新检测,我们也发现了两种商业核酸检测试剂盒报告的假阴性和假阳性结果。
通过自动化桑格方法鉴定特征性DNA序列,对于有分子生物学经验的临床实验室在液基宫颈巴氏(Pap)细胞学标本中验证HPV基因分型以及沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的分子检测很有用,可提高这些基于DNA检测的特异性。然而,即使是针对高危HPV基因分型的高特异性检测,在宫颈癌患病率低的人群中对癌前病变的阳性预测值可能低得令人无法接受。