Mangold Kathy A, Regner MaryAnn, Tajuddin Mohammed, Tajuddin Aamair M, Jennings Lawrence, Du Hongyan, Kaul Karen L
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 May;45(5):1403-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00834-06. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
Screening assays for Neisseria gonorrhoeae exhibit low positive predictive values, particularly in low-prevalence populations. A new real-time PCR assay that detects and identifies individual Neisseria spp. using melt curve analysis was compared to two previously published supplementary assays. NsppID, a 16S rRNA real-time PCR/melt curve assay developed to distinguish N. gonorrhoeae from other Neisseria spp., was compared to real-time PCR assays targeting genes reportedly specific for N. gonorrhoeae, the cppB gene and the porA pseudogene. A total of 408 clinical specimens (324 female endocervical swabs and 84 male urine or urogenital swab specimens) were screened using the COBAS Amplicor assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae (CT/NG) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) followed by confirmatory testing via real-time PCR. The NsppID assay detected Neisseria spp. in 150/181 COBAS-positive specimens (82%), including six dual infections, and identified N. gonorrhoeae in 102 (56%) specimens. Sixty-nine of 181 (38%) specimens were positive for N. gonorrhoeae by porA pseudogene, and 115/181 (64%) were positive for cppB. However, cppB was also positive in 15% of COBAS-negative specimens, more than either NsppID (4%) or porA pseudogene (2%) assays. The porA pseudogene assay had the highest specificity for both genders but the lowest sensitivity, especially in female specimens. NsppID had a slightly lower specificity but greater sensitivity and overall accuracy. The least desirable confirmatory assay was cppB, due to poor specificity. The NsppID assay is an accurate confirmatory assay for N. gonorrhoeae detection. In addition, the NsppID assay can identify the non-N. gonorrhoeae species responsible for the majority of false-positive results from the COBAS Amplicor CT/NG assay.
淋病奈瑟菌的筛查检测显示出较低的阳性预测值,尤其是在低流行率人群中。一种利用熔解曲线分析来检测和鉴定单个奈瑟菌属物种的新型实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法,与之前发表的两种补充检测方法进行了比较。NsppID是一种为区分淋病奈瑟菌与其他奈瑟菌属物种而开发的16S rRNA实时PCR/熔解曲线检测方法,与针对据报道对淋病奈瑟菌特异的基因cppB基因和porA假基因的实时PCR检测方法进行了比较。总共408份临床标本(324份女性宫颈拭子和84份男性尿液或泌尿生殖系统拭子标本)首先使用COBAS Amplicor沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌(CT/NG)检测方法(罗氏诊断公司,印第安纳波利斯,印第安纳州)进行筛查,然后通过实时PCR进行确证检测。NsppID检测方法在181份COBAS检测呈阳性的标本中的150份(82%)中检测到了奈瑟菌属物种(包括6份双重感染),并在102份(56%)标本中鉴定出了淋病奈瑟菌。181份标本中的69份(38%)通过porA假基因检测为淋病奈瑟菌阳性,115/181(64%)通过cppB检测为阳性。然而,cppB在15%的COBAS检测呈阴性的标本中也呈阳性,比NsppID检测方法(4%)或porA假基因检测方法(2%)更高。porA假基因检测方法对两性的特异性最高,但灵敏度最低,尤其是在女性标本中。NsppID的特异性略低,但灵敏度和总体准确性更高。由于特异性较差,最不理想的确证检测方法是cppB。NsppID检测方法是一种用于淋病奈瑟菌检测的准确确证检测方法。此外,NsppID检测方法可以鉴定出导致COBAS Amplicor CT/NG检测方法大多数假阳性结果的非淋病奈瑟菌物种。