Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Hippocampus. 2009 Dec;19(12):1159-86. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20578.
We investigated the cortical efferents of the parahippocampal region by placing injections of the anterograde tracers, Phaseolus vulgaris-leuccoagglutinin, and biotinylated dextran amine, throughout the perirhinal (PER), postrhinal (POR), and entorhinal cortices of the rat brain. The resulting density of labeled fibers was evaluated in 25 subregions of the piriform, frontal, insular, temporal, cingulate, parietal, and occipital areas. The locations of labeled terminal fibers differed substantially depending on whether the location of the injection site was in PER area 35, PER area 36, POR, or the lateral or the medial entorhinal (LEA and MEA). The differences were greater for sensory regions. For example, the POR efferents preferentially target visual and spatial regions, whereas the PER efferents target all sensory modalities. The cortical efferents of each region largely reciprocate the cortical afferents, though the degree of reciprocity varied across originating and target regions. The laminar pattern of terminal fibers was consistent with the notion that the efferents are feedback projections. The density and amount of labeled fibers also differed substantially depending on the regional location of injection sites. PER area 36 and POR give rise to a greater number of heavy projections, followed by PER area 35. LEA also gives rise to widespread cortical efferents, arising mainly from a narrow band of cortex adjacent to the PER. In contrast, the remainder of the LEA and the MEA provides only weak efferents to cortical regions. Prior work has shown that nonspatial and spatial information is transmitted to the hippocampus via the PER-LEA and POR-MEA pathways, respectively. Our findings suggest that the return projections follow the same pathways, though perhaps with less segregration.
我们通过在大鼠大脑的peri-hippocampal (PER)、post-hippocampal (POR) 和 entorhinal cortices 中放置顺行示踪剂,Phaseolus vulgaris-leuccoagglutinin 和 biotinylated dextran amine,来研究海马旁回区域的皮质传出。在梨状、额、岛、颞、扣带回、顶和枕叶的 25 个亚区评估标记纤维的密度。标记终末纤维的位置取决于注射部位的位置是在 PER 区 35、PER 区 36、POR 还是外侧或内侧 entorhinal (LEA 和 MEA)。差异在感觉区域更为明显。例如,POR 传出纤维优先靶向视觉和空间区域,而 PER 传出纤维靶向所有感觉模式。每个区域的皮质传出纤维在很大程度上与皮质传入纤维相互作用,尽管起源和靶区之间的相互作用程度有所不同。终末纤维的层模式与传出纤维是反馈投射的概念一致。标记纤维的密度和数量也取决于注射部位的区域位置而有很大差异。PER 区 36 和 POR 产生更多的重型投射,其次是 PER 区 35。LEA 也产生广泛的皮质传出纤维,主要来自紧邻 PER 的狭窄皮层带。相比之下,LEA 的其余部分和 MEA 仅向皮质区域提供微弱的传出纤维。先前的工作表明,非空间和空间信息分别通过 PER-LEA 和 POR-MEA 途径传递到海马体。我们的发现表明,返回投射遵循相同的途径,尽管可能没有那么明显的分离。