• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受颈动脉支架置入术患者的围介入期神经并发症发生率取决于所治疗狭窄的部位。

Peri-interventional neurological complication rates in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting depend on the side of the stenosis treated.

作者信息

Juergen Kammler, Hermann Blessberger, Michael Lichtenauer, Thomas Lambert, Joerg Kellermair, Alexander Nahler, Stefan Schwarz, Christian Reiter, Michael Grund, Alexander Kypta, Clemens Steinwender

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.

Department of Internal Medicine II, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2017 Oct;32(10):1169-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-0986-3. Epub 2017 May 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-017-0986-3
PMID:28474136
Abstract

CAS has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis. We investigated if the side of the stenosis treated has an influence on the neurological outcome of our patients. CAS was performed in 1124 patients at our center. The left carotid artery (group L) was intervened in 557 and the right carotid artery (group R) in 567 patients. Data of both patient groups were analyzed with respect to the total rate of peri-interventional ischemic cerebral events, defined as transient ischemic attacks, minor and major strokes, respectively. The total peri-interventional ischemic cerebral event rate was 10.1% in group L and 6.7% in group R (p = 0.042), respectively. The routine use of a filter wire resulted in a significant reduction of complication rates in group L (from 14.7 to 7.1%; p = 0.005) but not in group R (from 7.8 to 6.0%; p = 0.505). Ischemic cerebral events did not differ between group L and R, when only patients in whom a filter wire was used were analyzed (7.1% in group L and 6.0% in group R, p = 0.174). Peri-interventional ischemic cerebral complication rates in patients undergoing CAS differ with respect to the side treated. This may be due to a more frequent plaque mobilization caused by the guiding catheter.

摘要

颈动脉血管成形术(CAS)已成为治疗严重颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术的替代方法。我们研究了所治疗狭窄的侧别是否会对我们患者的神经学预后产生影响。我们中心对1124例患者实施了CAS。其中557例干预左侧颈动脉(L组),567例干预右侧颈动脉(R组)。分析了两组患者围手术期缺血性脑事件的总发生率,围手术期缺血性脑事件分别定义为短暂性脑缺血发作、轻度和重度卒中。L组围手术期缺血性脑事件总发生率为10.1%,R组为6.7%(p = 0.042)。常规使用滤网导丝使L组并发症发生率显著降低(从14.7%降至7.1%;p = 0.005),但R组未降低(从7.8%降至6.0%;p = 0.505)。仅分析使用滤网导丝的患者时,L组和R组的缺血性脑事件无差异(L组为7.1%,R组为6.0%,p = 0.174)。接受CAS治疗的患者围手术期缺血性脑并发症发生率因治疗的侧别而异。这可能是由于引导导管导致斑块移动更频繁所致。

相似文献

1
Peri-interventional neurological complication rates in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting depend on the side of the stenosis treated.接受颈动脉支架置入术患者的围介入期神经并发症发生率取决于所治疗狭窄的部位。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Oct;32(10):1169-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-0986-3. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Carotid artery stenting for recurrent carotid artery restenosis after previous ipsilateral carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.颈动脉支架置入术治疗同侧颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再发颈动脉狭窄:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.004.
3
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
4
Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases.解剖学变量与颈动脉支架置入术围手术期更高的卒中/TIA 发生率有关:833 例连续病例的单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):321-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23483. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Peri-procedural Risk with Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting: A Population based Swedvasc Study.围手术期紧急颈动脉支架置入术的风险:基于人群的 Swedvasc 研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 May;49(5):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
6
Quantitative analysis and predictors of embolic filter debris load during carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic patients.无症状患者颈动脉支架置入术中滤器栓塞物负荷的定量分析及预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.055. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
7
Carotid artery stenting in recently symptomatic patients: a single center experience.近期有症状患者的颈动脉支架置入术:单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 May;24(4):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
8
Statins reduce peri-procedural complications in carotid stenting.他汀类药物可降低颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
10
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial.支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)随机试验
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):529-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
Chronotropic response during treadmill exercise and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis after adjusting for the calibrated SCORE risk classification: a cross-sectional study.
在校正校准的SCORE风险分类后,跑步机运动期间的变时性反应与亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化:一项横断面研究。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Feb;31(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0584-6. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
4
Aortic arch calcification evaluated on chest X-ray is a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events in chronic hemodialysis patients.胸部X线检查评估的主动脉弓钙化是慢性血液透析患者心血管事件的强有力独立预测指标。
Heart Vessels. 2012 Mar;27(2):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00380-011-0129-1. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
5
Carotid artery stenting with distal filter protection: single-center experience in high-surgical-risk patients.带远端滤器保护的颈动脉支架置入术:高手术风险患者的单中心经验
Heart Vessels. 2011 Mar;26(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0002-7. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
6
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
7
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验:介入专家资质认证及导入期的最终结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001.
8
Language lateralization correlates with verbal memory performance in children with focal epilepsy.语言侧化与局灶性癫痫儿童的言语记忆表现相关。
Epilepsia. 2010 Apr;51(4):627-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02406.x. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
9
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术:手术并发症与干预侧有关吗?:来自德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050.
10
Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后死亡和中风的预测因素:Pro-CAS数据的亚组分析
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2325-30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.514356. Epub 2008 Jun 26.