Evison John, Farese Stefan, Seitz Michael, Uehlinger Dominik E, Furrer Hansjakob, Mühlemann Kathrin
Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 15;48(10):1402-12. doi: 10.1086/598193.
To our knowledge, no study to date has compared the effects of a subunit influenza vaccine with those of a virosomal influenza vaccine on immunocompromised patients.
A prospective, double-blind, randomized study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of subunit and virosomal influenza vaccines for adult patients who had an immunosuppressive disease or who were immunocompromised as a result of treatment.
There were 304 patients enrolled in our study: 131 with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, 47 with a chronic rheumatologic disease, 74 who underwent a renal transplant, 47 who received long-term hemodialysis, and 5 who had some other nephrologic disease. There were 151 patients who received the subunit vaccine and 153 patients who received the virosomal vaccine. A slightly higher percentage of patients from the subunit vaccine group were protected against all 3 influenza vaccine strains after being vaccinated, compared with patients from the virosomal vaccine group (41% vs. 30% of patients; P = .03). Among HIV-infected patients, the level of HIV RNA, but not the CD4 cell count, was an independent predictor of vaccine response. Among renal transplant patients, treatment with mycophenolate significantly reduced the immune response to vaccination. The 2 vaccines were comparable with regard to the frequency and severity of local and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination. Disease-specific scores for the activity of rheumatologic diseases did not indicate flare-ups 4-6 weeks after vaccination.
For immunosuppressed patients, the subunit vaccine was slightly more immunogenic than the virosomal vaccine. The 2 vaccines were comparable with regard to reactogenicity. Vaccine response decreased with increasing degree of immune suppression. Among HIV-infected patients, the viral load, rather than the CD4 cell count, predicted the protective immune response to the vaccine.
NCT00783380 .
据我们所知,迄今为止尚无研究比较亚单位流感疫苗和病毒体流感疫苗对免疫功能低下患者的影响。
开展了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究,比较亚单位流感疫苗和病毒体流感疫苗对患有免疫抑制疾病或因治疗导致免疫功能低下的成年患者的免疫原性和反应原性。
我们的研究共纳入304例患者:131例人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者、47例慢性风湿性疾病患者、74例接受肾移植者、47例接受长期血液透析者以及5例患有其他肾病者。151例患者接受亚单位疫苗,153例患者接受病毒体疫苗。与病毒体疫苗组患者相比,亚单位疫苗组中接种疫苗后对所有3种流感疫苗株均产生保护作用的患者比例略高(分别为41%和30%;P = 0.03)。在HIV感染患者中,HIV RNA水平而非CD4细胞计数是疫苗反应的独立预测指标。在肾移植患者中,霉酚酸酯治疗显著降低了疫苗接种后的免疫反应。两种疫苗在接种后7天内局部和全身反应的频率及严重程度方面具有可比性。风湿性疾病活动的疾病特异性评分未显示接种疫苗后4 - 6周病情复发。
对于免疫抑制患者,亚单位疫苗的免疫原性略高于病毒体疫苗。两种疫苗在反应原性方面具有可比性。疫苗反应随免疫抑制程度的增加而降低。在HIV感染患者中,病毒载量而非CD4细胞计数可预测疫苗的保护性免疫反应。
NCT00783380 。