Kushiro Akira, Chervaux Christian, Cools-Portier Stephanie, Perony Audrey, Legrain-Raspaud Sophie, Obis David, Onoue Masaharu, van de Moer Ariane
Yakult Honsha European Research Center for Microbiology, ESV, Technologiepark 4 Bus 3, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jun 1;132(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
We applied two methods of broth microdilution and Etest for measuring minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria for 15 antimicrobial agents to compare the feasibility, reproducibility, and equivalence of the two methods. Both methods were originally described by the European projects PROSAFE and ACE-ART. In 84% combinations of strains and antimicrobial agents MIC differences between the two methods were within one Log(2) dilution. In the case of rifampicin the difference between the two methods was more than ten-fold. We further determined MICs of 70 strains (14 strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, 16 strains of Lactococcus lactis, 30 strains of Streptococcus thermophilus, and 10 strains of Bifidobacterium longum) by the broth microdilution method. In most cases, MIC distributions were uni-modal and within 5 Log(2) dilutions except for the MIC distribution of L. lactis to the aminoglycoside group which was broader. These data are a good basis for improving knowledge of antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria, and can be used to revise tentative epidemiological cut-off values.
我们应用肉汤微量稀释法和Etest两种方法来测定乳酸菌和双歧杆菌对15种抗菌剂的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),以比较这两种方法的可行性、可重复性和等效性。这两种方法最初均由欧洲项目PROSAFE和ACE - ART描述。在84%的菌株与抗菌剂组合中,两种方法的MIC差异在1个对数(2)稀释度范围内。对于利福平,两种方法的差异超过10倍。我们进一步通过肉汤微量稀释法测定了70株菌株(14株德氏保加利亚乳杆菌、16株乳酸乳球菌、30株嗜热链球菌和10株长双歧杆菌)的MIC。在大多数情况下,MIC分布呈单峰,且在5个对数(2)稀释度范围内,除了乳酸乳球菌对氨基糖苷类的MIC分布较宽。这些数据是增进对乳酸菌和双歧杆菌抗菌敏感性了解的良好基础,可用于修订暂定的流行病学临界值。