Quartz Steven R
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, and Computation and Neural Systems Program 1200 E. California Blvd, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 May;13(5):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Many models of judgment and decision-making posit distinct cognitive and emotional contributions to decision-making under uncertainty. Cognitive processes typically involve exact computations according to a cost-benefit calculus, whereas emotional processes typically involve approximate, heuristic processes that deliver rapid evaluations without mental effort. However, it remains largely unknown what specific parameters of uncertain decision the brain encodes, the extent to which these parameters correspond to various decision-making frameworks, and their correspondence to emotional and rational processes. Here, I review research suggesting that emotional processes encode in a precise quantitative manner the basic parameters of financial decision theory, indicating a reorientation of emotional and cognitive contributions to risky choice.
许多判断和决策模型假定,在不确定性条件下进行决策时,认知和情感发挥着不同的作用。认知过程通常涉及根据成本效益计算进行精确运算,而情感过程通常涉及近似的启发式过程,这些过程无需费力思考就能快速做出评估。然而,大脑对不确定决策的哪些具体参数进行编码、这些参数与各种决策框架的对应程度,以及它们与情感和理性过程的对应关系,在很大程度上仍不为人知。在此,我回顾了一些研究,这些研究表明情感过程以精确的定量方式对金融决策理论的基本参数进行编码,这表明情感和认知在风险选择中的作用发生了重新定位。