Alba R D, Logan J R
Department of Sociology, State University of New York, Albany 12222.
Demography. 1991 Aug;28(3):431-53.
To investigate racial and ethnic diversity in suburbanization, we draw on two complementary theoretical traditions, which we label "assimilation" and "stratification." Our analytic model is multilevel, and includes variables characterizing individuals, households, and metropolitan contexts. We use it to analyze the determinants of suburban versus central-city residence for 11 racial/ethnic groups. The analysis reveals that family status, socioeconomic, and assimilation variables influence the suburbanization process rather consistently. We take this finding as evidence in favor of the assimilation model. These effects display group variations, however, in a manner predicted by the stratification model. There are also suburbanization differences among metropolitan areas, particularly related to the relative economic status of cities and their suburbs, and between the northeast/north central regions and the south/west. Finally, we conclude that suburbanization is variable across the groups in a way that is not captured by broad categories such as "Asian" or "Hispanic."
为了研究郊区化过程中的种族和民族多样性,我们借鉴了两种互补的理论传统,我们将其分别称为“同化”和“分层”。我们的分析模型是多层次的,包括表征个人、家庭和大都市环境的变量。我们用它来分析11个种族/民族群体选择居住在郊区还是市中心的决定因素。分析表明,家庭状况、社会经济和同化变量对郊区化过程的影响相当一致。我们将这一发现作为支持同化模型的证据。然而,这些影响呈现出群体差异,其方式与分层模型的预测相符。大都市地区之间也存在郊区化差异,特别是与城市及其郊区的相对经济地位有关,以及东北/中北部地区和南部/西部地区之间的差异。最后,我们得出结论,郊区化在不同群体中存在差异,这种差异无法通过“亚洲人”或“西班牙裔”等宽泛类别来体现。