Keegel Tessa, Ostry Aleck, Lamontagne Anthony D
School of Population Health, McCaughey Centre: Vichealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
J Public Health Policy. 2009 Apr;30(1):17-39. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.41.
We present a comparative analysis of patterns of exposure to job stressors and stress-related workers' compensation (WC) claims to provide an evaluation of the adequacy of claims-driven policy and practice. We assessed job strain prevalence in a 2003 population-based survey of Victorian [Australia] workers and compared these results with stress-related WC statistics for the same year. Job strain prevalence was higher among females than males, and elevated among lower vs. higher occupational skill levels. In comparison, claims were higher among females than males, but primarily among higher skill-level workers. There was some congruence between exposure and WC claims patterns. Highly exposed groups in lower socio-economic positions were underrepresented in claims statistics, suggesting that the WC insurance perspective substantially underestimates the job stress problems for these groups. Thus to provide a sufficient evidence base for equitable policy and practice responses to this growing public health problem, exposure or health outcome data are needed as an essential complement to claims statistics.
我们对工作压力源暴露模式和与压力相关的工人补偿(WC)索赔进行了比较分析,以评估基于索赔的政策和实践的充分性。我们在2003年对澳大利亚维多利亚州工人进行的一项基于人群的调查中评估了工作压力患病率,并将这些结果与同年与压力相关的WC统计数据进行了比较。女性的工作压力患病率高于男性,且在较低职业技能水平人群中高于较高职业技能水平人群。相比之下,女性的索赔高于男性,但主要集中在高技能水平的工人中。暴露模式和WC索赔模式之间存在一定的一致性。社会经济地位较低的高暴露群体在索赔统计数据中代表性不足,这表明WC保险视角大大低估了这些群体的工作压力问题。因此,为了为公平应对这一日益严重的公共卫生问题提供充分的政策和实践依据,需要将暴露或健康结果数据作为索赔统计数据的重要补充。