• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童不同体温测量方法的比较]

[Comparison of different methods of temperature measurment in children].

作者信息

Pavlović Momcilo, Radlović Nedeljko, Leković Zoran, Berenji Karolina

机构信息

Decje odeljenje, Opsta bolnica Subotica.

出版信息

Med Pregl. 2008 Nov-Dec;61(11-12):615-9. doi: 10.2298/mpns0812615p.

DOI:10.2298/mpns0812615p
PMID:19368282
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The consequences of failing to notice fever in children can be serious. On the other hand, false positive reading can result in unnecesery investigation or diagnostic approach. The aim of this study was to compare different ways of body temperature measurement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on Pediatric Department of General Hospital in Subotica during 10 months (March-December 2006). In 263 children aged 1 month to 18 years of age, the body temperature was obtained from 4 measurement sites: tactile assesment, forehead and ear by electronic thermometer, rectal temperature in small children (up to 2 years of age) or axillar temperature in older children by mercury thermometer. Tympanic thermometry was considered as a standard for fever detection.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of rectal temperature to detect fever is 46.67%, while specificity is 92.19%. The sensitivity of fever detection by electronic thermometry on the forehead is lower according to rectal thermometry - 36.08%, while specificity is 95.18%. The lowest values ofsensitivity are recorded in axillar thermometry (35.82%), specificity is 90.20%. The correlation coefficient is higher between tympanic and rectal temperature measurement (r=0.5076, p<0.0005), than between tympanic and forehead measurements (r=0.5076, p<0,0005), while the lowest was between tympanic and axillar mesurement sites (r=0.4933, p<0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study and literature data show that the most accurate methods of thermometry are rectal measurement of body temperature in small children and tympanic thermometry in children over 2 years of age.

摘要

引言

未察觉儿童发热的后果可能很严重。另一方面,假阳性读数可能导致不必要的检查或诊断方法。本研究的目的是比较不同的体温测量方法。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性研究于2006年3月至12月在苏博蒂察综合医院儿科进行。对263名年龄在1个月至18岁的儿童,从4个测量部位获取体温:触觉评估、用电子温度计测量额头和耳朵温度、对幼儿(2岁及以下)测量直肠温度或对大龄儿童用汞温度计测量腋窝温度。鼓膜测温法被视为发热检测的标准方法。

结果

直肠温度检测发热的灵敏度为46.67%,而特异性为92.19%。与直肠测温法相比,用电子温度计测量额头温度检测发热的灵敏度较低——为36.08%,而特异性为95.18%。腋窝测温法的灵敏度最低(35.82%),特异性为90.20%。鼓膜温度测量与直肠温度测量之间的相关系数更高(r = 0.5076,p < 0.0005),高于鼓膜与额头测量之间的相关系数(r = 0.5076,p < 0.0005),而鼓膜与腋窝测量部位之间的相关系数最低(r = 0.4933,p < 0.0005)。

结论

我们的研究结果和文献数据表明,最准确的测温方法是对幼儿进行直肠体温测量,对2岁以上儿童进行鼓膜测温。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of different methods of temperature measurment in children].[儿童不同体温测量方法的比较]
Med Pregl. 2008 Nov-Dec;61(11-12):615-9. doi: 10.2298/mpns0812615p.
2
Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes.除用于筛查目的外,前额或耳部体温测量不能替代直肠体温测量。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-0994-1.
3
[Measurement of fever in children--is infrared tympanic thermometry reliable?].[儿童发热的测量——红外鼓膜测温法可靠吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Nov 20;122(28):2700-1.
4
[Comparative study of tympanic and mercury thermometry in children].[儿童鼓膜测温与水银测温的比较研究]
Gac Med Mex. 1998 Jan-Feb;134(1):9-14.
5
An evaluation of tympanic thermometry in a paediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科鼓膜测温法的评估
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):40-1. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.022764.
6
A comparative study on accuracy of liquid crystal forehead, digital electronic axillary, infrared tympanic with glass-mercury rectal thermometer in infants and young children.液晶额头体温计、数字电子腋下体温计、红外鼓膜体温计与玻璃汞柱直肠体温计在婴幼儿中准确性的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2000 Sep;83(9):1068-76.
7
Accuracy of a noninvasive temporal artery thermometer for use in infants.用于婴儿的无创颞动脉体温计的准确性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Mar;155(3):376-81. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.3.376.
8
Measurement accuracy of fever by tympanic and axillary thermometry.鼓膜测温法和腋温测量法测量发热的准确性。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jan;23(1):16-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802c61e6.
9
Screening for fever in an adult emergency department: oral vs tympanic thermometry.成人急诊科发热筛查:口腔测温与鼓膜测温对比
South Med J. 1996 Feb;89(2):230-4. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199602000-00016.
10
Accuracy of tympanic and forehead thermometers in private paediatric practice.鼓膜和额部体温计在私人儿科实践中的准确性。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):e80-3. doi: 10.1111/apa.12464. Epub 2013 Nov 18.