Lainscak Mitja, Anker Stefan D
Division of Cardiology, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.
Herz. 2009 Mar;34(2):141-7. doi: 10.1007/s00059-009-3211-z.
Decision-making in the care for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) has become increasingly difficult. The many available therapeutic strategies and novel treatment modalities with borderline or modest benefit call for careful risk stratification in patients with CHF. Rather than relying on highly sophisticated and expensive procedures, we may find routinely available parameters of clinical value. This review considers the importance and validity of serum biomarkers (like natriuretic peptides, uric acid, lipoproteins, and cytokines), metabolic changes (like insulin resistance or body mass index), patient measures of symptom status and exercise capacity, as well as prognostic scoring systems. There is limited evidence that the use of prognostic markers to make treatment decisions improves the outcome in CHF. Many studies still need to be done to this end.
慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的护理决策变得越来越困难。许多可用的治疗策略和具有临界或适度益处的新型治疗方式要求对CHF患者进行仔细的风险分层。我们或许可以找到具有临床价值的常规可用参数,而不是依赖高度复杂且昂贵的程序。本综述探讨了血清生物标志物(如利钠肽、尿酸、脂蛋白和细胞因子)、代谢变化(如胰岛素抵抗或体重指数)、患者症状状态和运动能力的测量指标以及预后评分系统的重要性和有效性。使用预后标志物来做出治疗决策能否改善CHF的结局,这方面的证据有限。为此仍需开展许多研究。