Edthofer Alexander, Ettel Dina, Schneider Gerhard, Körner Andreas, Kreuzer Matthias
Institute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Dec 26. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01258-8.
EEG monitoring during anesthesia or for diagnosing sleep disorders is a common standard. Different approaches for measuring the important information of this biosignal are used. The most often and efficient one for entropic parameters is permutation entropy as it can distinguish the vigilance states in the different settings. Due to high calculation times, it has mostly been used for low orders, although it shows good results even for higher orders. Entropy of difference has a similar way of extracting information from the EEG as permutation entropy. Both parameters and different algorithms for encoding the associated patterns in the signal are described. The runtimes of both entropic measures are compared, not only for the needed encoding but also for calculating the value itself. The mutual information that both parameters extract is measured with the AUC for a linear discriminant analysis classifier. Entropy of difference shows a smaller calculation time than permutation entropy. The reduction is much larger for higher orders, some of them can even only be computed with the entropy of difference. The distinguishing of the vigilance states between both measures is similar as the AUC values for the classification do not differ significantly. As the runtimes for the entropy of difference are smaller than for the permutation entropy, even though the performance stays the same, we state the entropy of difference could be a useful method for analyzing EEG data. Higher orders of entropic features may also be investigated better and more easily.
在麻醉期间或用于诊断睡眠障碍时进行脑电图(EEG)监测是一种常见的标准做法。人们采用了不同的方法来测量这种生物信号的重要信息。对于熵参数而言,最常用且有效的方法是排列熵,因为它能够在不同情况下区分警觉状态。由于计算时间较长,它大多用于低阶情况,不过即使对于高阶情况,它也能显示出良好的结果。差分熵从脑电图中提取信息的方式与排列熵类似。文中描述了这两个参数以及用于对信号中相关模式进行编码的不同算法。比较了这两种熵测度的运行时间,不仅包括所需的编码时间,还包括计算值本身的时间。使用线性判别分析分类器的曲线下面积(AUC)来测量这两个参数提取的互信息。差分熵的计算时间比排列熵短。对于高阶情况,这种减少更为显著,其中一些高阶情况甚至只能用差分熵来计算。两种测度在区分警觉状态方面相似,因为分类的AUC值没有显著差异。由于差分熵的运行时间比排列熵短,尽管性能保持不变,但我们认为差分熵可能是分析脑电图数据的一种有用方法。对于更高阶的熵特征,也可能更容易进行更好的研究。