Suppr超能文献

超声引导与神经刺激用于肌间沟置管的前瞻性随机比较。

A prospective randomized comparison of ultrasound guidance versus neurostimulation for interscalene catheter placement.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):590-4. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181ada622.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound (US) imaging facilitates catheter placement adjacent to the most appropriate elements of the brachial plexus, which for shoulder surgery are the C5YC6 roots or superior trunk. Therefore, it was investigated whether such placement would improve catheter effectiveness compared to placement with traditional techniques.

METHODS

Needles introduced for catheter insertion were prospectively randomized to either US guidance immediately lateral to the C5-C6 roots/superior middle trunks (n = 43) or neurostimulation (NS) guidance to an appropriate motor response at less than 0.5 mA (n = 40). Ropivacaine 0.5% 30 mL was administered via the catheter before surgery under general anesthesia. After surgery, ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 2 mL/hr with on-demand 5-mL boluses via an elastomeric pump was continued at home for 2 to 5 days. Patients were questioned regarding the need for ropivacaine boluses, tramadol, and numerical rating pain score (NRPS) on postoperative days 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Catheter interventions for an NRPS of greater than 2 (0-10) in recovery were lower in the US group (US = 2/43, NS = 10/39; P = 0.007). Day 1 median ropivacaine bolus consumption (US = 1, NS = 2; P = 0.03) and the proportion of subjects requiring 2 or more tramadol tablets (US = 2/43, NS = 7/39; P = 0.04) were lower in the US group. These differences were not present on day 2. Postoperative pain was similar in both groups. Median (quartiles) needle time under the skin was lower in the US group (49 secs [41-55 secs]) than the NS group (97 secs [80-137 secs]) (P G 0.001) and was associated with a 1-point reduction in procedural NRPS (median [quartiles]: US = 2 [1-4], NS = 3 [2-6]; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

After shoulder surgery, interscalene catheters placed with US demonstrated improved effectiveness during the first 24 hrs compared with those placed with NS. These catheters were also placed with less needling and a very small reduction in procedure-related pain.

摘要

背景与目的

超声(US)成像可辅助将导管放置于臂丛神经的最佳部位附近,对于肩部手术,这是 C5YC6 神经根或上干。因此,研究了与传统技术相比,这种放置方式是否会提高导管的有效性。

方法

前瞻性随机将用于导管插入的针分为 US 引导组(立即位于 C5-C6 神经根/中上干的外侧,n = 43)或神经刺激(NS)引导组(在小于 0.5 mA 时获得适当的运动反应,n = 40)。全身麻醉下手术前,经导管给予 0.5%罗哌卡因 30 mL。手术后,在家中通过弹性泵以 2 mL/hr 的速度输注 0.2%罗哌卡因,并按需给予 5-mL 推注,持续 2 至 5 天。术后第 1 天和第 2 天,询问患者对罗哌卡因推注、曲马多和数字评分疼痛量表(NRPS)的需求。

结果

在恢复过程中,NRPS 大于 2(0-10)的导管干预,US 组较低(US = 2/43,NS = 10/39;P = 0.007)。第 1 天中位数罗哌卡因推注消耗(US = 1,NS = 2;P = 0.03)和需要 2 片或更多曲马多片的患者比例(US = 2/43,NS = 7/39;P = 0.04)在 US 组较低。第 2 天没有这些差异。两组术后疼痛相似。US 组的皮下进针时间中位数(四分位距)较低(49 秒[41-55 秒]),而 NS 组较高(97 秒[80-137 秒])(PG 0.001),且与手术相关的 NRPS 降低 1 分(中位数[四分位距]:US = 2 [1-4],NS = 3 [2-6];P = 0.002)。

结论

肩部手术后,与 NS 组相比,US 引导下放置的经肌间沟导管在最初 24 小时内的效果更好。这些导管的置管次数较少,与手术相关的疼痛也略有减轻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验