从大到小：制定与政策相关的研究摘要的过程。
From big to small: a process for developing policy-relevant research summaries.
作者信息
Wathen C Nadine, Watson Gillian K, Jack Susan M, Caldwell Sarah, Lewis Nancy
机构信息
Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, ON.
出版信息
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):60-9.
Abstract
Government departments and not-for-profit agencies expend significant resources commissioning and conducting research, only to find their resulting lengthy reports shelved and unused. In this case study, we describe a project that developed short, policy-relevant research summaries of topics prioritized by the Ontario Women's Health Council, an advisory body to the province's Minister of Health and Long-Term Care. These products were created based on an understanding of policy makers' needs and work contexts and were designed to help users find, understand and utilize research evidence to inform their clinical, programmatic and policy decision-making.
摘要
政府部门和非营利机构投入大量资源委托并开展研究，结果却发现生成的长篇报告被束之高阁，无人使用。在本案例研究中，我们描述了一个项目，该项目针对安大略省妇女健康理事会（该省卫生和长期护理部部长的咨询机构）确定优先次序的主题，编写了简短且与政策相关的研究摘要。这些产品是在了解政策制定者的需求和工作背景的基础上创建的，旨在帮助用户查找、理解并利用研究证据，为其临床、项目和政策决策提供信息。
相似文献
1
From big to small: a process for developing policy-relevant research summaries.从大到小：制定与政策相关的研究摘要的过程。
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):60-9.
2
Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.落实研究：为决策者提供情境化证据综合的创新方法。
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;6(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4.
3
Do evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocol.证据总结能否增加政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用：一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;4:122. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0116-1.
4
Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence.公共卫生决策者获取研究证据的信息需求和偏好。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):156-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00089.x.
5
Australian health policy makers' priorities for research synthesis: a survey.澳大利亚卫生政策制定者对研究综述的优先事项：一项调查
Aust Health Rev. 2012 Nov;36(4):401-11. doi: 10.1071/AH11064.
6
Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.评估政策制定者、学者和专家对巴勒斯坦卫生研究系统绩效的满意度：一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x.
7
Comparative effectiveness research in Ontario, Canada: producing relevant and timely information for health care decision makers.加拿大安大略省的比较效果研究：为医疗保健决策者提供相关且及时的信息。
Milbank Q. 2009 Sep;87(3):585-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00572.x.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods.支持医疗保健和政策决策的快速综述项目：对流程和方法的描述性分析
Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 14;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0022-6.
10
Research use at the Ministry of Health in Burkina Faso: the decision-makers' perspective.布基纳法索卫生部的研究用途：决策者的观点。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 17;2(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00126-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research.在加拿大与大学研究人员合作方面的健康领导力经验——呼吁“重新构想”研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):684-699. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66.
2
Mining the management literature for insights into implementing evidence-based change in healthcare.挖掘管理文献以获取关于在医疗保健中实施循证变革的见解。
Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):33-48.
3
Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women.谈、信、时：一项纵向研究评估暴力侵害妇女问题研究的知识转化和交流过程。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 6;6:102. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-102.
4
5
Designing a knowledge transfer and exchange strategy for the Alberta Depression Initiative: contributions of qualitative research with key stakeholders.为艾伯塔省抑郁症倡议设计知识转移和交流策略：与主要利益相关者合作的定性研究的贡献。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2009 Jun 12;3(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-3-11.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Involving decision-makers in producing research syntheses: the case of the research collective on primary healthcare in quebec.让决策者参与研究综述的撰写：以魁北克初级医疗保健研究集体为例。
Healthc Policy. 2007 May;2(4):e193-209.
3
The research collective: a tool for producing timely, context-linked research syntheses.研究集体：一种用于及时产出与背景相关的研究综述的工具。
Healthc Policy. 2006 May;1(4):58-75.
4
Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence.公共卫生决策者获取研究证据的信息需求和偏好。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):156-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00089.x.
5
Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?迷失在知识转化之中：是不是该有一张路线图了？
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
6
How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?研究机构如何更有效地将研究知识传递给决策者？
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052.
7
Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context.知识转化框架的开发：理解用户背景。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Apr;8(2):94-9. doi: 10.1258/135581903321466067.
8
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.卫生政策制定者对其证据运用情况的认知：一项系统综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778.
9
Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine.循证医学的循证实施。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Oct;25(10):503-13. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30464-3.
Zotero 插件