• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

落实研究:为决策者提供情境化证据综合的创新方法。

Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.

机构信息

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John's, NL, A1B 2X5, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;6(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4
PMID:29096710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5667442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Contextualized Health Research Synthesis Program (CHRSP), developed in 2007 by the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, produces contextualized knowledge syntheses for health-system decision makers. The program provides timely, relevant, and easy-to-understand scientific evidence; optimizes evidence uptake; and, most importantly, attunes research questions and evidence to the specific context in which knowledge users must apply the findings.

METHODS

As an integrated knowledge translation (KT) method, CHRSP: Involves intensive partnerships with senior healthcare decision makers who propose priority research topics and participate on research teams; Considers local context both in framing the research question and in reporting the findings; Makes economical use of resources by utilizing a limited number of staff; Uses a combination of external and local experts; and Works quickly by synthesizing high-level systematic review evidence rather than primary studies. Although it was developed in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador, the CHRSP methodology is adaptable to a variety of settings with distinctive features, such as those in rural, remote, and small-town locations.

RESULTS

CHRSP has published 25 syntheses on priority topics chosen by the provincial healthcare system, including: Clinical and cost-effectiveness: telehealth, rural renal dialysis, point-of-care testing; Community-based health services: helping seniors age in place, supporting seniors with dementia, residential treatment centers for at-risk youth; Healthcare organization/service delivery: reducing acute-care length of stay, promoting flu vaccination among health workers, safe patient handling, age-friendly acute care; and Health promotion: diabetes prevention, promoting healthy dietary habits. These studies have been used by decision makers to inform local policy and practice decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

By asking the health system to identify its own priorities and to participate directly in the research process, CHRSP fully integrates KT among researchers and knowledge users in healthcare in Newfoundland and Labrador. This high level of decision-maker buy-in has resulted in a corresponding level of uptake. CHRSP studies have directly informed a number of policy and practice directions, including the design of youth residential treatment centers, a provincial policy on single-use medical devices, and most recently, the opening of the province's first Acute Care for the Elderly hospital unit.

摘要

背景

语境化健康研究综合计划(CHRSP)于 2007 年由纽芬兰和拉布拉多应用健康研究中心开发,为卫生系统决策者提供语境化知识综合服务。该计划提供及时、相关和易于理解的科学证据;优化证据的采用;最重要的是,使研究问题和证据适应知识使用者必须应用研究结果的具体背景。

方法

作为一种综合知识转化(KT)方法,CHRSP:与高级医疗保健决策者建立密集的合作伙伴关系,他们提出优先研究课题并参与研究团队;在提出研究问题和报告研究结果时考虑当地情况;通过利用有限数量的工作人员来经济地利用资源;利用外部和本地专家的组合;通过综合高级系统评价证据而不是初级研究来快速工作。尽管它是在加拿大纽芬兰和拉布拉多省开发的,但 CHRSP 方法适用于具有独特特征的各种环境,例如农村、偏远和小镇环境。

结果

CHRSP 已经就省级医疗系统选择的优先主题发布了 25 项综合研究,包括:临床和成本效益:远程医疗、农村肾脏透析、即时检测;基于社区的卫生服务:帮助老年人在家中安度晚年、支持痴呆症老年人、有风险的青年住宅治疗中心;医疗保健组织/服务提供:缩短急性护理住院时间、促进卫生工作者接种流感疫苗、安全患者搬运、老年人友好型急性护理;以及健康促进:糖尿病预防、促进健康饮食习惯。这些研究已被决策者用于为当地政策和实践决策提供信息。

结论

通过要求卫生系统确定自己的优先事项并直接参与研究过程,CHRSP 在纽芬兰和拉布拉多的研究人员和医疗保健知识使用者之间充分整合了 KT。这种高水平的决策者参与导致了相应水平的采用。CHRSP 研究直接为一些政策和实践方向提供了信息,包括青年住宅治疗中心的设计、省级一次性医疗器械政策,以及最近纽芬兰省第一家急性老年病医院病房的开设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6a/5667442/3380bf4c18f8/13643_2017_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6a/5667442/3380bf4c18f8/13643_2017_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6a/5667442/3380bf4c18f8/13643_2017_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.落实研究:为决策者提供情境化证据综合的创新方法。
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;6(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
6
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.知识转化平台:中介、媒介还是更多?对定义、功能和特征的范围综述
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 1;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01383-z.
2
From Chaos to Rationality: A Contingent Meta-Model for Evidence-Informed Health Policymaking in Diverse Contexts.从混乱到理性:一个适用于不同背景下循证健康政策制定的偶然元模型。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jun 18;38:69. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.69. eCollection 2024.
3
Evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada: a qualitative exploration.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review.证据在英国地方公共卫生决策中的应用:一项系统性综述。
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9.
2
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.在卫生政策与实践中,为基于证据的决策对研究证据进行快速审查的最佳方法有哪些:一项快速审查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 25;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0155-7.
3
Systematic reviews are not enough: policymakers need a greater variety of synthesized evidence.
加拿大公共卫生领域基于证据的决策制定:一项定性探索
JBI Evid Implement. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):103-118. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000454.
4
Reimagining How We Synthesize Information to Impact Clinical Care, Policy, and Research Priorities in Real Time: Examples and Lessons Learned from COVID-19.重新构想我们如何实时综合信息以影响临床护理、政策和研究重点:来自 COVID-19 的实例与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2554-2559. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08855-y. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Feasibility of Identifying Factors Related to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia in Real-World Data.在真实世界数据中识别与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症相关因素的可行性
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 13:2024.02.10.24302621. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.10.24302621.
6
The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada.海洋 SPOR 支持单位 (MSSU) 桥梁流程:一种综合知识转化方法,用于解决加拿大新斯科舍省的优先健康问题并增加合作研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6901. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6901. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
7
Decision-makers' experiences with rapid evidence summaries to support real-time evidence informed decision-making in crises: a mixed methods study.决策者在利用快速证据总结支持危机实时证据决策方面的经验:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 25;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09302-0.
8
Policy options to increase motivation for improving evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran.提高伊朗循证健康政策制定改进动力的政策选择。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jun 7;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00737-7.
9
[Promotion of physical activity among the elderly as an example of knowledge translation: How do scientific findings enter community practice?].[以促进老年人身体活动为例的知识转化:科学发现如何进入社区实践?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 May;64(5):560-567. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03311-2. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research.在加拿大与大学研究人员合作方面的健康领导力经验——呼吁“重新构想”研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):684-699. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66.
系统评价是不够的:政策制定者需要更多种类的综合证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:11-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.032. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review.政策制定者和医疗保健管理者采用系统评价的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 12;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1.
5
A scoping review of rapid review methods.快速综述方法的范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 16;13:224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.
6
Backwards design or looking sideways? knowledge translation in the real world Comment on "A call for a backward design to knowledge translation".倒向设计还是旁敲侧击?真实世界中的知识转化 评“呼吁知识转化的倒向设计”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Mar 24;4(8):545-7. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.71.
7
Evidence-informed health policy making in Canada: past, present, and future.加拿大基于证据的卫生政策制定:过去、现在与未来。
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Nov;8(4):215-21. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12169.
8
Developing a rapid-response program for health system decision-makers in Canada: findings from an issue brief and stakeholder dialogue.为加拿大卫生系统决策者制定快速反应计划:一份问题简报及利益相关者对话的结果
Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;4:25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0009-3.
9
Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review.基于本地/医院的卫生技术评估(HTA)的效果与影响:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;3:129. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-129.
10
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.