• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌龟1,野兔0:加拿大与美国之间的健康趋势对比如何支持对政策与健康的长远看法

Tortoises 1, Hares 0: How Comparative Health Trends between Canada and the United States Support a Long-term View of Policy and Health.

作者信息

Hertzman Clyde, Siddiqi Arjumand

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2008 Nov;4(2):16-24.

PMID:19377366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2645214/
Abstract

Fifty years ago, Canadian and US life expectancies were roughly equal. Now, however, Canadians are, on average, healthier than Americans. To discover the reasons behind this trend, the authors compared Canada and the United States on a range of determinants of health based on data from 1950 to the present. Their analysis yielded three conclusions: (1) greater economic well-being and spending on healthcare did not yield better health outcomes; (2) public provision and income redistribution trump economic success where population health is concerned; and (3) the gradual development of public provision represents the build-up of social infrastructure that has long-lasting effects on health status. The authors contend that in the context of thinking about population health, the historical, dynamic approach casts a clearer light on trends than does the cross-sectional approach.

摘要

五十年前,加拿大和美国的预期寿命大致相当。然而现在,加拿大人的总体健康状况优于美国人。为了探寻这一趋势背后的原因,作者基于1950年至今的数据,在一系列健康决定因素方面对加拿大和美国进行了比较。他们的分析得出了三个结论:(1)更高的经济福祉和医疗保健支出并未带来更好的健康结果;(2)在人口健康方面,公共供给和收入再分配比经济成就更为重要;(3)公共供给的逐步发展代表着社会基础设施的建设,这对健康状况具有长期影响。作者认为,在思考人口健康问题时,历史动态方法比横断面方法能更清晰地揭示趋势。

相似文献

1
Tortoises 1, Hares 0: How Comparative Health Trends between Canada and the United States Support a Long-term View of Policy and Health.乌龟1,野兔0:加拿大与美国之间的健康趋势对比如何支持对政策与健康的长远看法
Healthc Policy. 2008 Nov;4(2):16-24.
2
Towards an epidemiological understanding of the effects of long-term institutional changes on population health: a case study of Canada versus the USA.从流行病学角度理解长期制度变迁对人口健康的影响:以加拿大与美国为例的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Feb;64(3):589-603. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.034. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
3
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
4
Comparing the health of low income and less well educated groups in the United States and Canada.比较美国和加拿大低收入和受教育程度较低群体的健康状况。
Popul Health Metr. 2007 Oct 16;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-5-10.
5
What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?加拿大人和美国人可以从彼此的医疗保健系统中学到什么?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):349-70. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2374. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
6
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
Public Spending on Health Services and Policy Research in Canada: A Reflection on Thakkar and Sullivan Comment on "Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal".加拿大卫生服务和政策研究的公共支出:对 Thakkar 和 Sullivan 评论“加拿大、英国和美国的卫生服务和政策研究的公共支出:一个适度的建议”的反思。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 1;7(5):463-466. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.113.
9
The cost of schizophrenia: lessons from an international comparison.精神分裂症的成本:来自国际比较的经验教训。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006 Dec;9(4):177-83.
10
Social determinants of health in relation to firearm-related homicides in the United States: A nationwide multilevel cross-sectional study.与美国枪支相关的凶杀案有关的健康社会决定因素:一项全国性的多层次横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 17;16(12):e1002978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002978. eCollection 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Wide Variability in Emergency Physician Admission Rates: A Target to Reduce Costs Without Compromising Quality.急诊医生收治率差异巨大:一个在不影响质量的前提下降低成本的目标。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):561-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30832. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
Interrogating scarcity: how to think about 'resource-scarce settings'.探讨匮乏:如何思考“资源匮乏环境”
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jul;28(4):400-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs071. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards an epidemiological understanding of the effects of long-term institutional changes on population health: a case study of Canada versus the USA.从流行病学角度理解长期制度变迁对人口健康的影响:以加拿大与美国为例的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Feb;64(3):589-603. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.034. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
2
Cervical cancer mortality by neighbourhood income in urban Canada from 1971 to 1996.1971年至1996年加拿大城市地区按邻里收入划分的宫颈癌死亡率。
CMAJ. 2004 May 11;170(10):1545-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031528.
3
Increasing inequalities in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults aged 25-64 years by area socioeconomic status, 1969-1998.1969年至1998年期间,美国25至64岁成年人因地区社会经济地位导致的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率不平等现象加剧。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):600-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.3.600.
4
Income distribution and life expectancy: a critical appraisal.收入分配与预期寿命:批判性评估
BMJ. 1995 Nov 11;311(7015):1282-5; discussion 1285-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1282.
5
Income distribution and life expectancy.收入分配与预期寿命。
BMJ. 1992 Jan 18;304(6820):165-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.165.