Barbut F, Menuet D, Verachten M, Girou E
National Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):507-14. doi: 10.1086/597232.
To compare a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist system and a 0.5% hypochlorite solution with respect to their ability to disinfect Clostridium difficile-contaminated surfaces in vitro and in situ.
Prospective, randomized, before-after trial.
Two French hospitals affected by C. difficile.
In situ efficacy of disinfectants was assessed in rooms that had housed patients with C. difficile infection. A prospective study was performed at 2 hospitals that involved randomization of disinfection processes. When a patient with C. difficile infection was discharged, environmental contamination in the patient's room was evaluated before and after disinfection. Environmental surfaces were sampled for C. difficile by use of moistened swabs; swab samples were cultured on selective plates and in broth. Both disinfectants were tested in vitro with a spore-carrier test; in this test, 2 types of material, vinyl polychloride (representative of the room's floor) and laminate (representative of the room's furniture), were experimentally contaminated with spores from 3 C. difficile strains, including the epidemic clone ribotype 027-North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1.
There were 748 surface samples collected (360 from rooms treated with hydrogen peroxide and 388 from rooms treated with hypochlorite). Before disinfection, 46 (24%) of 194 samples obtained in the rooms randomized to hypochlorite treatment and 34 (19%) of 180 samples obtained in the rooms randomized to hydrogen peroxide treatment showed environmental contamination. After disinfection, 23 (12%) of 194 samples from hypochlorite-treated rooms and 4 (2%) of 180 samples from hydrogen peroxide treated rooms showed environmental contamination, a decrease in contamination of 50% after hypochlorite decontamination and 91% after hydrogen peroxide decontamination (P < .005). The in vitro activity of 0.5% hypochlorite was time dependent. The mean (+/-SD) reduction in initial log(10) bacterial count was 4.32 +/- 0.35 log(10) colony-forming units after 10 minutes of exposure to hypochlorite and 4.18 +/- 0.8 log(10) colony-forming units after 1 cycle of hydrogen peroxide decontamination.
In situ experiments indicate that the hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system is significantly more effective than 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution at eradicating C. difficile spores and might represent a new alternative for disinfecting the rooms of patients with C. difficile infection.
比较过氧化氢干雾系统和0.5%次氯酸盐溶液在体外和原位对艰难梭菌污染表面的消毒能力。
前瞻性、随机、前后对照试验。
两家受艰难梭菌影响的法国医院。
在曾收治过艰难梭菌感染患者的病房中评估消毒剂的原位效果。在两家医院进行了一项前瞻性研究,涉及消毒过程的随机分组。当一名艰难梭菌感染患者出院时,在消毒前后对患者病房的环境污染情况进行评估。使用湿棉签对环境表面采样以检测艰难梭菌;棉签样本在选择性平板和肉汤中培养。两种消毒剂均通过孢子载体试验进行体外测试;在该试验中,两种类型的材料,聚氯乙烯(代表病房地板)和层压板(代表病房家具),被来自3株艰难梭菌菌株的孢子实验性污染,包括流行克隆核糖体分型027 - 北美脉冲场凝胶电泳1型。
共收集了748份表面样本(360份来自用过氧化氢处理的病房,388份来自用次氯酸盐处理的病房)。在消毒前,随机分配到次氯酸盐处理病房的194份样本中有46份(24%)以及随机分配到过氧化氢处理病房的180份样本中有34份(19%)显示存在环境污染。消毒后,次氯酸盐处理病房的194份样本中有23份(12%)以及过氧化氢处理病房的180份样本中有4份(2%)显示存在环境污染,次氯酸盐消毒后污染减少了50%,过氧化氢消毒后污染减少了91%(P < 0.005)。0.5%次氯酸盐的体外活性具有时间依赖性。暴露于次氯酸盐10分钟后,初始对数(10)细菌计数的平均(±标准差)减少量为4.32 ± 0.35对数(10)菌落形成单位,过氧化氢消毒1个周期后为4.18 ± 0.8对数(10)菌落形成单位。
原位实验表明,过氧化氢干雾消毒系统在根除艰难梭菌孢子方面明显比0.5%次氯酸钠溶液更有效,可能代表了一种对艰难梭菌感染患者病房进行消毒的新方法。