Suppr超能文献

在医疗保险人群中进行CT结肠成像筛查结直肠癌和主动脉瘤:成本效益分析。

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Pickhardt Perry J, Hassan Cesare, Laghi Andrea, Kim David H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1332-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2646.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CT colonography (CTC) is a recommended test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to the updated 2008 American Cancer Society guidelines. CTC can also accurately detect abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This collaborative gastroenterology-radiology project evaluated the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of CTC in the Medicare population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerized Markov model simulated the development of CRC and AAA in a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 U.S. adults > or = 65 years old. Screening with CTC at 5- and 10-year intervals using a 6-mm size threshold for polypectomy was compared with primary optical colonoscopy screening every 10 years and with no screening. Base case costs for CTC and optical colonoscopy were $674 and $795, respectively. The costs of the imaging workup for extracolonic findings at CTC were also included.

RESULTS

CTC resulted in 7,786 and 7,027 life-years gained at 5- and 10-year intervals, respectively, compared with 6,032 life-years gained with 10-year optical colonoscopy. The increase in overall efficacy with CTC was primarily due to prevention of AAA rupture because CRC prevention and CRC detection rates were similar for CTC and optical colonoscopy. All three strategies were highly cost-effective compared with no screening, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6,088, $1,251, and $1,104 per life-year gained for 5-year CTC, 10-year CTC, and 10-year optical colonoscopy strategies, respectively. The ICER of 5-year CTC and 10-year CTC versus optical colonoscopy was $23,234 and $2,144 per life-year gained, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Because of its ability to simultaneously screen for both CRC and AAA, CTC is a highly cost-effective and clinically efficacious screening strategy for the Medicare population.

摘要

目的

根据2008年美国癌症协会更新指南,CT结肠成像(CTC)是推荐用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的检测方法。CTC还能准确检测腹主动脉瘤(AAA)。这个胃肠病学与放射学合作项目评估了CTC在医疗保险人群中的成本效益和临床疗效。

材料与方法

一个计算机化马尔可夫模型模拟了100,000名年龄≥65岁的美国成年人假设队列中CRC和AAA的发展情况。将每5年和10年使用6毫米息肉切除大小阈值进行CTC筛查与每10年进行一次原发性光学结肠镜筛查以及不进行筛查进行比较。CTC和光学结肠镜检查的基础成本分别为674美元和795美元。还纳入了CTC时结肠外发现的成像检查成本。

结果

与10年光学结肠镜检查获得的6,032个生命年相比,CTC分别在5年和10年间隔时导致获得7,786个和7,027个生命年。CTC总体疗效的提高主要归因于预防AAA破裂,因为CTC和光学结肠镜检查在CRC预防和CRC检测率方面相似。与不进行筛查相比,所有三种策略都具有很高的成本效益,5年CTC、10年CTC和10年光学结肠镜检查策略每获得一个生命年的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为6,088美元、1,251美元和1,104美元。5年CTC和10年CTC与光学结肠镜检查相比,每获得一个生命年的ICER分别为23,234美元和2,144美元。

结论

由于CTC能够同时筛查CRC和AAA,对于医疗保险人群而言,它是一种具有高成本效益和临床疗效的筛查策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验