Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Aug;41(8):1441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0798-4.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be undertaken utilizing a variety of distinct approaches, which provides both opportunities and confusion. Traditionally, there has often been a trade-off between the degree of invasiveness of a screening test and its ability to prevent cancer, with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and optical colonoscopy (OC) at each end of the spectrum. CT colonography (CTC), although currently underutilized for CRC screening, represents an exception since it is only minimally invasive, yet provides accurate evaluation for advanced adenomas. More recently, the FDA approved a multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard) and a blood-based test (Epi proColon) for average-risk CRC screening. This commentary will provide an overview of these two new non-invasive tests, including the clinical indications, mechanism of action, and diagnostic performance. Relevance to radiology practice, including a comparison with CTC, will also be discussed.
结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可以采用多种不同的方法进行,这既提供了机会,也带来了困惑。传统上,筛查试验的侵袭程度与其预防癌症的能力之间往往存在权衡,粪便潜血试验(FOBT)和光学结肠镜检查(OC)分别处于两个极端。CT 结肠成像(CTC)虽然目前在 CRC 筛查中的应用不足,但它是一个例外,因为它仅具有轻微的侵袭性,但可对高级腺瘤进行准确评估。最近,FDA 批准了一种用于结直肠癌筛查的多靶点粪便 DNA 检测(Cologuard)和一种基于血液的检测(Epi proColon)。本评论将概述这两种新的非侵入性检测方法,包括临床适应证、作用机制和诊断性能。还将讨论与放射科实践的相关性,包括与 CTC 的比较。