Channa Roomasa, Jaffrani Hira Altaf, Khan Aamir Javed, Hasan Talal, Razzak Junaid Abdul
Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Int J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;1(3):201-4. doi: 10.1007/s12245-008-0051-1. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
Rapid urban growth in developing countries has outpaced the development of health infrastructure, including trauma centers, leading to potential delays in trauma care. This study was conducted in Karachi, a city of 16 million people in Pakistan.
Our aim was to determine the time taken to reach the nearest 24-h emergency care facility (ECF) and the government-designated trauma center (TC). We also sought to determine the availability of supplies and equipment required for "basic" trauma care at these centers.
We selected five towns in Karachi that had the highest number of road traffic injuries (RTIs) (as identified through medicolegal records). We then measured the time taken to reach the nearest ECF and the government-designated TC from four compass points within each town. We also asked about the equipment and supplies used in basic trauma care.
All three TCs in Karachi were located in the selected towns and were within 5.0-10.5 km of each other. The transport times to the 3 TCs were an average of 13.3 min (+/- 7.1) and to the 16 ECFs an average of 4.7 min (+/- 2.4) (p value < 0.00). Most ECFs did not have all equipment and supplies necessary for basic trauma care; 90% had the basic equipment for management of airway, oxygen, and IV fluids, 70% had morphine, and 45% had C-spine collars.
Vital time is lost in reaching a government-designated TC. ECFs might be an alternative option, but are not fully equipped and funded to provide adequate trauma care to all.
发展中国家城市的快速扩张超过了包括创伤中心在内的卫生基础设施的发展速度,导致创伤救治可能出现延误。本研究在巴基斯坦拥有1600万人口的卡拉奇市开展。
我们的目的是确定到达最近的24小时急救设施(ECF)和政府指定创伤中心(TC)所需的时间。我们还试图确定这些中心进行“基本”创伤救治所需物资和设备的可用性。
我们在卡拉奇选择了道路交通伤(RTI)数量最多的五个城镇(通过法医学记录确定)。然后我们测量了从每个城镇内的四个方位点到达最近的ECF和政府指定TC所需的时间。我们还询问了基本创伤救治中使用的设备和物资情况。
卡拉奇的所有三个TC都位于选定的城镇内,且彼此相距5.0 - 10.5公里。前往这3个TC的平均运输时间为13.3分钟(±7.1),前往16个ECF的平均时间为4.7分钟(±2.4)(p值<0.00)。大多数ECF没有基本创伤救治所需的所有设备和物资;90%具备气道管理、氧气和静脉输液的基本设备,70%有吗啡,45%有颈椎固定器。
前往政府指定的TC会浪费关键时间。ECF可能是一个替代选择,但没有充分配备设备和资金来为所有人提供足够的创伤救治。