Suppr超能文献

农村发展中地区的创伤治疗结果:与城市一级创伤中心的比较。

Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: comparison with an urban level I trauma center.

作者信息

Mock C N, Adzotor K E, Conklin E, Denno D M, Jurkovich G J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):518-23. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004.

Abstract

Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14,270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59% of patients were seen > 24 hours after injury, compared with 4% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25% of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 +/- 6.3) than a HFH (6.7 +/- 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6%) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62%) and HMC (54%). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0.7% n = 6390; HFH: 0.3%, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3%, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10%, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41%, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73%, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在发达国家,创伤是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,这一点广为人知,但在发展中国家,对此的研究却不够充分。我们回顾了1987年至1991年期间收治于加纳贝雷库姆一家农村非洲医院——圣家医院(HFH)的539例创伤患者,并将这些结果与同期收治于华盛顿州西雅图市一级创伤中心——海港景医疗中心(HMC)的14270例患者进行了比较。在HFH,59%的患者在受伤24小时后才就诊,而HMC患者这一比例为4%(p<0.001)。只有25%的HFH患者接受了院前护理,而HMC患者这一比例为82%(p<0.001)。HMC的平均损伤严重度评分(ISS)(10.0±6.3)高于HFH(6.7±6.5)(p<0.001),但两家机构的创伤死亡率相同(6%)。神经损伤是HFH(62%)和HMC(54%)死亡的主要原因。ISS为1 - 8的患者在两家机构的死亡率无显著差异(HMC:0.7%,n = 6390;HFH:0.3%,n = 342)。与HFH(10%,n = 146)相比,HMC中ISS为9 - 24的患者死亡率显著降低(3%,n = 3709)(p<0.001)。与HFH(73%,n = 26)相比,HMC中ISS>24的患者死亡率降低幅度较小(41%,n = 1520)(p<0.01)。在这个发展中国家,导致死亡的损伤类型和严重程度表明,基于医院的低成本改变并不能改善治疗结果。(摘要截取自250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验