Chen Lei, Xiao Tianli, Chen Wensheng, Long Qingling, Li Rongjun, Fang Dianchun, Wang Rongquan
Department of Gastroenterology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Liver Int. 2009 Aug;29(7):1101-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02016.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is technically divided into TIPS through the left branch of the portal vein (TIPS-LBPV) and TIPS through the right branch of the portal vein (TIPS-RBPV). In order to compare their advantages and disadvantages, this randomized, controlled trial was designed to investigate their outcomes in advanced cirrhotic patients.
Seventy-two patients were randomly placed into TIPS-LBPV (36 patients) and TIPS-RBPV (36 patients, with four failures) groups, and they were prospectively followed for 2 years after TIPS implantation.
Patients who underwent the two different kinds of TIPS were balanced during recruitment for this study. The incidences of overall encephalopathy and de novo encephalopathy in the TIPS-LBPV group were significantly lower than that of the TIPS-RBPV group during follow-up (P=0.036 and 0.012 respectively). The incidences of rebleeding or re-intervention and improvement of ascites were similar between groups (P>0.05). Patients undergoing TIPS-RBPV required more rehospitalization and incurred more costs than those who underwent TIPS-LBPV (P=0.030 and 0.039 respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups in survival based on a survival curve constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method (P>0.05).
Patients undergoing TIPS-LBPV had a lower incidence of encephalopathy, less rehospitalization and lower costs after TIPS implantation compared with patients undergoing TIPS-RBPV.
背景/目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在技术上分为经门静脉左支的TIPS(TIPS-LBPV)和经门静脉右支的TIPS(TIPS-RBPV)。为比较二者的优缺点,本随机对照试验旨在研究其在晚期肝硬化患者中的疗效。
72例患者被随机分为TIPS-LBPV组(36例)和TIPS-RBPV组(36例,4例失败),TIPS植入术后对他们进行了为期2年的前瞻性随访。
在本研究招募过程中,接受两种不同TIPS的患者情况均衡。随访期间,TIPS-LBPV组的总体脑病和新发脑病发生率显著低于TIPS-RBPV组(分别为P = 0.036和0.012)。两组间再出血或再次干预的发生率以及腹水改善情况相似(P>0.05)。与接受TIPS-LBPV的患者相比,接受TIPS-RBPV的患者需要更多次住院且费用更高(分别为P = 0.030和0.039)。根据Kaplan-Meier方法构建的生存曲线显示,两组生存率无显著差异(P>0.05)。
与接受TIPS-RBPV的患者相比,接受TIPS-LBPV的患者在TIPS植入术后脑病发生率更低,住院次数更少且费用更低。