Boll Sabrina, Berti Stefan
Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2009 May;46(3):645-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00803.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
Distractibility with auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus changes was investigated using an audio-visual distraction paradigm. Participants were asked to discriminate between equiprobable short and long audio-visual stimuli. Infrequently, the auditory, the visual, or both parts of the stimuli changed. These rare deviations (deviants) were irrelevant for the actual task. The influence of the three types of deviant stimuli on the processing of task-relevant information was assessed with behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures assuming that bimodal deviants would lead to an increase in distraction. Behavioral and ERP results did not support this assumption, as reaction time (RT) prolongation and components amplitudes did not differ significantly for auditory and bimodal deviants. It is suggested that a maximal threshold of distraction accounts for these results. In addition, the processing of bimodal deviations was assessed. Audio-visual interactions were found following modality-specific deviance detection suggesting that integration only occurs with involuntary attention switching to task-irrelevant changes.
使用视听分心范式研究了听觉、视觉和双模式刺激变化引起的分心情况。参与者被要求区分等概率的短和长视听刺激。偶尔,刺激的听觉、视觉或两部分会发生变化。这些罕见的偏差(异常刺激)与实际任务无关。假设双模式异常刺激会导致分心增加,采用行为和事件相关电位(ERP)测量方法评估了三种类型的异常刺激对任务相关信息处理的影响。行为和ERP结果不支持这一假设,因为听觉和双模式异常刺激的反应时间(RT)延长和成分幅度没有显著差异。有人认为,最大分心阈值可以解释这些结果。此外,还评估了双模式偏差的处理情况。在特定模态的偏差检测后发现了视听交互作用,这表明只有在非自愿注意转向与任务无关的变化时才会发生整合。