Suppr超能文献

美国最高法院关于受害儿童:被告的宪法权利与儿童的最大利益。

The U.S. Supreme Court on victimized children: the constitutional rights of the defendant versus the best interests of the child.

作者信息

Kermani E J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;30(5):839-41.

PMID:1938804
Abstract

In deciding seven recent landmark child abuse cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has addressed and sought to balance the inherent conflict between the constitutional rights of the defendant and the best interests of the child. In four of the cases, the Court found that the interests of the child superseded the rights of the defendant. In three cases, the Court gave more validity to the constitutional rights of the defendant. The author examines the lengthy nature of such legal proceedings and the reasoning forming the basis for the Supreme Court's decisions.

摘要

在裁决最近七起具有里程碑意义的虐待儿童案件时,美国最高法院处理并试图平衡被告的宪法权利与儿童的最大利益之间固有的冲突。在其中四起案件中,最高法院认定儿童的利益优先于被告的权利。在另外三起案件中,最高法院更倾向于维护被告的宪法权利。作者审视了此类法律程序的漫长特性以及构成最高法院裁决依据的推理过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验