• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评价臀间裂部位皮瓣转移术(Limberg flap)后引流必要性的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical study evaluating the need for drainage after Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Medical Faculty of Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2010 Jan;158(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.005
PMID:19394643
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted to evaluate the need for drainage after rhomboid excision and a Limberg flap (RELIF) for the treatment of pilonidal sinus.

METHODS

One hundred one patients undergoing the RELIF procedure were randomly treated with drainage or not. Operating time, postoperative pain assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), total amount of intramuscular analgesic administered, hospital stay, complications, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean operating time (P = 0.036), VAS scores on postoperative day 0 (P = 0.039) and day 1 (P = 0.006), intramuscular analgesic requirement (P = 0.009), mean amount of intramuscular analgesic administered (P = 0.025), complication rate (P = 0.027), and mean hospital stay (P = 0.0001) were significantly reduced in the non-drained group. The recurrence rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that drain placement after the RELIF procedure might negatively affect the postoperative outcomes of patients with pilonidal sinus. On the basis of these finding, we suggest that the use of drains may not be necessary after the RELIF procedure for the treatment of pilonidal sinus.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性随机临床试验旨在评估菱形切除术和 Limberg 皮瓣(RELIF)治疗藏毛窦是否需要引流。

方法

101 例行 RELIF 手术的患者随机接受引流或不引流治疗。评估手术时间、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估的疼痛程度、肌内镇痛总量、住院时间、并发症、复发率和患者满意度。

结果

非引流组的平均手术时间(P = 0.036)、术后第 0 天(P = 0.039)和第 1 天(P = 0.006)的 VAS 评分、肌内镇痛需求(P = 0.009)、肌内镇痛用量(P = 0.025)、并发症发生率(P = 0.027)和平均住院时间(P = 0.0001)均显著降低。两组的复发率相似(P = 0.32)。

结论

本研究表明,RELIF 手术后放置引流可能会对藏毛窦患者的术后结果产生负面影响。基于这些发现,我们建议在 RELIF 手术治疗藏毛窦时,引流的使用可能不是必需的。

相似文献

1
A randomized clinical study evaluating the need for drainage after Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus.一项评价臀间裂部位皮瓣转移术(Limberg flap)后引流必要性的随机临床试验。
J Surg Res. 2010 Jan;158(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.005.
2
Diathermy versus scalpel in Limberg flap in pilonidal sinus surgery. A prospective randomized trial.
Ann Ital Chir. 2014 Mar-Apr;85(2):148-52.
3
Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study.Karydakis 皮瓣与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦疾病的短期和长期疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
5
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:切除后一期缝合或皮瓣重建。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
6
Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study.藏毛窦手术中改良Limberg皮瓣和Karydakis皮瓣手术的比较:前瞻性随机研究
Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):870-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1.
7
Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus?使用Limberg皮瓣治疗藏毛窦时术后引流管是必需的吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Nov;41(11):1427-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02237061.
8
Treatment of adolescent pilonidal disease with a new modification to the Limberg flap: symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision and lateralization of the Limberg flap technique.应用 Limberg 皮瓣的改良术式(菱形切除并对称旋转皮瓣)治疗青少年藏毛窦病
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Aug;48(8):1744-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.029.
9
Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: long-term results in 411 patients.菱形切除及Limberg皮瓣修复术治疗藏毛窦:411例患者的长期疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;10(9):945-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01563.x. Epub 2008 May 3.
10
The effects of drainage on the rates of early wound complications and recurrences after Limberg flap reconstruction in patients with pilonidal disease.引流对皮瓣重建术后早期伤口并发症和复发率的影响。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Dec;15(4):425-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0782-5. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
[Long-term results of a pilot study on a two-stage procedure with primary excision and Limberg flap in the interval for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease].[一项关于两阶段手术的试点研究的长期结果,该手术包括一期切除和在间隔期采用Limberg皮瓣治疗骶尾部藏毛窦疾病]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02252-9.
2
Primary Closure of Pilonidal Sinus With Slide-Swing Skin Flap Compared With the Secondary Closure: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.与二期缝合相比,采用滑动摆动皮瓣一期缝合藏毛窦:单盲随机对照试验
Cureus. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32880. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020.
德国国家指南:肛门部藏毛窦疾病管理:2020 年更新版
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.地理因素和手术方式对全球藏毛窦疾病复发的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
5
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.与Limberg皮瓣术相比,一期中线缝合切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛疾病的随机临床试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
7
Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.藏毛窦疾病手术治疗中相同技术-同一外科医生手术方式的对比分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Aug;93(2):82-87. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.2.82. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.德国藏毛窦疾病管理国家指南。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1463-7. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis.切除和一期缝合后引流在藏毛窦中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Dec;17(6):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1024-9. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
The effects of drainage on the rates of early wound complications and recurrences after Limberg flap reconstruction in patients with pilonidal disease.引流对皮瓣重建术后早期伤口并发症和复发率的影响。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Dec;15(4):425-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0782-5. Epub 2011 Oct 28.