Baron Cecile, Aubry Jean-François, Tanter Mickael, Meairs Stephen, Fink Mathias
Laboratoire Ondes et Acoustique, University Paris 7, INSERM, 10, rue Vauquelin, Paris 75005, France.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jul;35(7):1148-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.11.014. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
Two clinical trials have used ultrasound to improve tPA thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The Combined Lysis of Thrombus in Brain Ischemia Using Transcranial Ultrasound and Systemic tPA (CLOTBUST) trial reported accelerated recanalisation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in patients with symptoms of MCA infarction, which were monitored with 2-MHz transcranial Doppler. In CLOTBUST, there was no increased bleeding as evidenced by cranial computed tomography. The Transcranial Low-Frequency Ultrasound-Mediated Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia (TRUMBI) trial, which employed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after tPA thrombolysis, was discontinued prematurely because of an increased number of secondary hemorrhages, possibly related to the use of low frequency 300-kHz ultrasound. The purpose of our work is to help identify possible mechanisms of intracerebral hemorrhage resulting from sonothrombolysis by applying a simulation tool that estimates the pressure levels in the human brain that are produced with different sonothrombolysis devices. A simulation software based on a finite difference time domain (FDTD) three-dimensional (3D) scheme was developed to predict acoustic pressures in the brain. This tool numerically models the wave propagation through the skull and reproduces both ultrasound protocols of CLOTBUST and TRUMBI for analysis of the distribution of acoustic pressure in the brain during stroke treatment. For the simulated TRUMBI trial, we analyzed both a "high" and "low" hypothesis according to published parameters (for high and low amplitude excitations). For these hypotheses, the mean peak rarefactional pressures in the brain were 0.26 +/- 0.2 MPa (high hypothesis) and 0.06 +/- 0.05 MPa (low hypothesis), with maximal local values as high as 1.2 MPa (high hypothesis) and 0.27 MPa (low hypothesis) for configurations modelled in this study. The peak rarefactional pressure was thus higher than the inertial acoustic cavitation threshold in the presence of a standing wave in large areas of the brain, even outside the targeted clot. For the simulated CLOTBUST trial, the maximum peak negative pressure was less than 0.07 MPa. This simulated pressure is below the threshold for both inertial and stable acoustic cavitation but likewise lower than any acoustic pressure that has been reported as sufficient for effective sonothrombolysis. Simulating the pressure field of ultrasound protocols for clinical trials of sonothrombolysis may help explain mechanisms of adverse effects. Such simulations could prove useful in the initial design and optimization of future protocols for this promising therapy of ischemic stroke.
两项临床试验利用超声改善急性缺血性中风患者的组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)溶栓治疗。“经颅超声与全身tPA联合溶解脑缺血血栓(CLOTBUST)”试验报告称,在大脑中动脉(MCA)梗死症状患者中,使用2兆赫经颅多普勒监测发现MCA再通加速。在CLOTBUST试验中,头颅计算机断层扫描显示出血并未增加。“经颅低频超声介导脑缺血溶栓(TRUMBI)”试验在tPA溶栓前后采用磁共振成像(MRI),由于继发性出血数量增加,该试验提前终止,这可能与使用300千赫低频超声有关。我们研究的目的是通过应用一种模拟工具来帮助确定超声溶栓导致脑出血的可能机制,该工具可估算不同超声溶栓设备在人脑中产生的压力水平。开发了一种基于时域有限差分(FDTD)三维(3D)方案的模拟软件,以预测脑内声压。该工具对穿过颅骨的波传播进行数值建模,并重现CLOTBUST和TRUMBI的超声方案,用于分析中风治疗期间脑内声压分布。对于模拟的TRUMBI试验,我们根据已发表的参数(高振幅和低振幅激发)分析了“高”和“低”两种假设。对于这些假设,脑内平均峰值稀疏压力在“高假设”下为0.26±0.2兆帕,在“低假设”下为0.06±0.05兆帕,在本研究建模的配置中,最大局部值在“高假设”下高达1.2兆帕,在“低假设”下为0.27兆帕。因此,即使在目标血栓之外,大脑大片区域存在驻波时,峰值稀疏压力也高于惯性声空化阈值。对于模拟的CLOTBUST试验,最大峰值负压小于0.07兆帕。该模拟压力低于惯性和稳定声空化阈值,但同样低于任何据报道足以实现有效超声溶栓的声压。模拟超声溶栓临床试验的超声方案压力场可能有助于解释不良反应机制。此类模拟在这种有前景的缺血性中风治疗未来方案的初步设计和优化中可能会很有用。