• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非紫癜性脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.

作者信息

Neuhaus Isaac M, Zane Lee T, Tope Whitney D

机构信息

Dermatologic Surgery and Laser Center, Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, 1701 Divisadero Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):920-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01156.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01156.x
PMID:19397667
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Erythematotelangiectatic (ET) rosacea is commonly treated with a variety of laser and light-based systems. Although many have been used successfully, there are a limited number of comparative efficacy studies.

OBJECTIVE

To compare nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser (PDL) with intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment in the ability to reduce erythema, telangiectasia, and symptoms in patients with moderate facial ET rosacea.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-face trial with nonpurpuragenic treatment with PDL and IPL and untreated control. Three monthly treatment sessions were performed with initial PDL settings of 10-mm spot size, 7 J/cm(2), 6-ms pulse duration and cryogen cooling, and initial IPL settings of 560-nm filter, a pulse train of 2.4 and 6.0 ms in duration separated by a 15-ms delay, and a starting fluence of 25 J/cm(2). Evaluation measures included spectrophotometric erythema scores, blinded investigator grading, and patient assessment of severity and associated symptoms.

RESULTS

PDL and IPL resulted in significant reduction in cutaneous erythema, telangiectasia, and patient-reported associated symptoms. No significant difference was noted between PDL and IPL treatment.

CONCLUSION

A series of nonpurpuragenic PDL and IPL treatments in ET rosacea was performed with similar efficacy and safety, and both modalities seem to be reasonable choices for the treatment of ET rosacea.

摘要

背景

红斑毛细血管扩张型(ET)酒渣鼻通常采用多种基于激光和光的系统进行治疗。尽管许多方法已成功应用,但比较疗效的研究数量有限。

目的

比较非紫癜性脉冲染料激光(PDL)与强脉冲光(IPL)治疗中度面部ET酒渣鼻患者在减轻红斑、毛细血管扩张和症状方面的能力。

方法

29例患者参与了一项随机、对照、单盲、面部双侧对照试验,分别接受非紫癜性PDL和IPL治疗以及不治疗对照。每月进行3次治疗,PDL初始设置为光斑大小10mm、能量密度7J/cm²、脉冲持续时间6ms及冷冻剂冷却,IPL初始设置为560nm滤光片、脉冲序列持续时间为2.4ms和6.0ms,间隔15ms延迟,起始能量密度为25J/cm²。评估指标包括分光光度法红斑评分、盲法研究者分级以及患者对严重程度和相关症状的评估。

结果

PDL和IPL均显著减轻了皮肤红斑、毛细血管扩张以及患者报告的相关症状。PDL和IPL治疗之间未发现显著差异。

结论

对ET酒渣鼻进行一系列非紫癜性PDL和IPL治疗,疗效和安全性相似,两种方式似乎都是治疗ET酒渣鼻的合理选择。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.非紫癜性脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮的疗效比较
Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):920-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01156.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
2
Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.比较脉冲染料激光和强脉冲光机头对面部毛细血管扩张症进行半脸随机治疗。
Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):97-102. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21151. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
A newly modified 595-nm pulsed dye laser with compression handpiece for the treatment of photodamaged skin.一种新改良的配有压缩机头的595纳米脉冲染料激光,用于治疗光损伤皮肤。
Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Oct;38(9):808-13. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20373.
4
Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.长脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光治疗光损伤皮肤的比较:一项采用盲法反应评估的随机半脸试验。
Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Jul;40(5):293-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20634.
5
Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.强脉冲光与长脉冲染料激光治疗面部皮肤年轻化的对比研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Nov;59(5):479-83. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3180327943.
6
Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.面部色素沉着的分脸治疗:配备压缩手柄的脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光对比
Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):672-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34126.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
7
A comparative study of a 595-nm with a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in refractory port wine stains.595纳米与585纳米脉冲染料激光治疗难治性葡萄酒色斑的对比研究
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Sep;153(3):601-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06707.x.
8
Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.脉冲染料激光与强脉冲光治疗鲜红斑痣的对比:一项采用盲法反应评估的随机并排试验
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Feb;160(2):359-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08993.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with the fractionation of high-fluence, long-pulsed 595-nm pulsed dye laser.采用高能量、长脉冲595纳米脉冲染料激光分次治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Mar;16(1):12-14. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12284. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Treatment of facial telangiectasia using a dual-wavelength laser system (595 and 1,064 nm): a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation.使用双波长激光系统(595纳米和1064纳米)治疗面部毛细血管扩张:一项采用盲法反应评估的随机对照试验
Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):702-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34131.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of BroadBand Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Dry Eye Disease with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍型干眼的安全性和有效性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 2;15:3983-3991. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S331289. eCollection 2021.
2
Light-Based Devices for the Treatment of Facial Erythema and Telangiectasia.用于治疗面部红斑和毛细血管扩张的光基设备。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Dec;11(6):1879-1887. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00607-8. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
3
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study: Combined 595-nm Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment and Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Topical Cream Superior to Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Cream for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.
一项随机对照初步研究:595nm 脉冲染料激光联合盐酸羟甲唑啉乳膏治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻优于盐酸羟甲唑啉乳膏。
Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Dec;53(10):1307-1315. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23439. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Updates and Best Practices in the Management of Facial Erythema.面部红斑管理的最新进展与最佳实践
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jun 8;14:601-614. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S267203. eCollection 2021.
5
Update on the Management of Rosacea from the American Acne & Rosacea Society (AARS).美国痤疮与玫瑰痤疮协会(AARS)发布的玫瑰痤疮管理最新情况。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020 Jun;13(6 Suppl):S17-S24. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Consensus on the therapeutic management of rosacea - Brazilian Society of Dermatology.酒渣鼻治疗管理共识 - 巴西皮肤病学会
An Bras Dermatol. 2020 Nov-Dec;95 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-69. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
Retrospective Study of Factors Affecting Efficacy of Therapy with Dye Pulsed Light for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.染料脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮疗效影响因素的回顾性研究
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Dec;10(6):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00440-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Update on the Management of Rosacea from the American Acne & Rosacea Society (AARS).美国痤疮与酒渣鼻协会(AARS)发布的酒渣鼻管理最新情况。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Jun;12(6):17-24. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
9
Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments.基于表型方法的酒渣鼻干预措施:一项包括 GRADE 评估的更新系统评价。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jul;181(1):65-79. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17590. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
10
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Acne-induced Post-inflammatory Erythema.强脉冲光治疗痤疮后炎症性红斑
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2018 May-Jun;9(3):159-164. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_306_17.