Logroscino Carlo Ambrogio, Proietti Luca, Tamburrelli Francesco Ciro
Department of Spine Surgery, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome 00135, Italy.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0995-8. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
Originally aimed at treating degenerative syndromes of the lumbar spine, percutaneous minimally invasive posterior fixation is nowadays even more frequently used to treat some thoracolumbar fractures. According to the modern principles of saving segment of motion, a short implant (one level above and one level below the injured vertebra) is generally used to stabilise the injured spine. Although the authors generally use a short percutaneous fixation in treating thoracolumbar fractures with good results, they observed some cases in which the high fragmentation of the vertebral body and the presence of other associated diseases (co-morbidities) did not recommend the use of a short construct. The authors identified nine cases, in which a long implant (two levels above and two levels below the injured vertebra) was performed by a percutaneous minimally invasive approach. Seven patients (five males/two females) were affected by thoracolumbar fractures. T12 vertebra was involved in three cases, L1 in two cases, T10 and L2 in one case, respectively. Two fractures were classified as type A 3.1, two as A 3.2, two as A 3.3 and one as B 2.3, according to Magerl. In the present series, there were also two patients affected by a severe osteolysis of the spine (T9 and T12) due to tumoral localisation. All patients operated on with long instrumentation had a good outcome with prompt and uneventful clinical recovery. At the 1-year follow-up, all patients except one, who died 11 months after the operation, did not show any radiologic signs of mobilisation or failure of the implant. Based on the results of the present series, the long percutaneous fixation seems to represent an effective and safe system to treat particular cases of vertebral lesions. In conclusion, the authors believe that a long implant might be an alternative surgical method compared to more aggressive or demanding procedures, which in a few patients could represent an overtreatment.
经皮微创后路固定最初旨在治疗腰椎退行性综合征,如今更常用于治疗一些胸腰椎骨折。根据现代的保留运动节段原则,一般使用短节段植入物(损伤椎体上下各一个节段)来稳定受伤的脊柱。尽管作者在治疗胸腰椎骨折时通常使用短节段经皮固定且效果良好,但他们观察到一些病例,椎体高度碎裂以及存在其他相关疾病(合并症)不建议使用短节段固定结构。作者确定了9例采用经皮微创方法植入长节段植入物(损伤椎体上下各两个节段)的病例。7例患者(5例男性/2例女性)患有胸腰椎骨折。12胸椎受累3例,1腰椎受累2例,10胸椎和2腰椎各受累1例。根据马格勒分类法,2例骨折为A 3.1型,2例为A 3.2型,2例为A 3.3型,1例为B 2.3型。在本系列中,还有2例患者因肿瘤定位导致脊柱严重骨质溶解(9胸椎和12胸椎)。所有接受长节段器械植入手术的患者预后良好,临床恢复迅速且顺利。在1年随访时,除1例术后11个月死亡的患者外,所有患者均未出现植入物松动或失败的任何影像学迹象。基于本系列结果,长节段经皮固定似乎是治疗特定椎体病变病例的一种有效且安全的方法。总之,作者认为与更激进或要求更高的手术相比,长节段植入物可能是一种替代手术方法,在少数患者中,后者可能属于过度治疗。