Verlaan J J, Diekerhof C H, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Verbout A J, Dhert W J A, Oner F C
Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):803-14. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000116990.31984.a9.
A systematic review of the literature, pertaining surgical treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, was performed.
To provide information on surgical techniques for traumatic spine fracture management, their respective performance and complication rates, based on previously published information.
The treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine remains controversial. There is insufficient evidence in the literature to choose between the various surgical options. In absence of conclusive studies, a systematic review can be an alternative to obtain more convincing information.
Full-text papers from 1970 until 2001 were included if strict inclusion criteria were met. Five surgical subgroups were recognized: posterior short-segment (PS), posterior long-segment (PL), reports on both posterior short- and long-segment (PSL), anterior (A), and anterior combined with posterior (AP) techniques. Clearly defined and generally accepted parameters were scored and subsequently analyzed. The preoperative injury severity of the surgical groups was compared. The neurologic, radiologic, and functional outcome and complications of all groups were assessed.
A total of 132 papers, the majority being retrospective case-series, were included representing 5,748 patients. The preoperative injury severity revealed an inequality between the subgroups. Partial neurologic deficits had the potential to resolve irrespective of treatment choice. None of the five techniques used was able to maintain the corrected kyphosis angle. The functional outcome after surgery seems to be better than generally believed. Complications are relatively rare.
In general, surgical treatment of traumatic spine fractures is safe and effective. Surgical techniques can only be compared using randomized controlled trials.
对有关创伤性胸腰椎骨折手术治疗的文献进行系统综述。
根据先前发表的信息,提供有关创伤性脊柱骨折治疗的手术技术、各自的性能和并发症发生率的信息。
胸腰椎创伤性骨折的治疗仍存在争议。文献中没有足够的证据在各种手术选择之间进行抉择。在缺乏确凿研究的情况下,系统综述可能是获取更有说服力信息的一种替代方法。
如果符合严格的纳入标准,则纳入1970年至2001年的全文论文。确定了五个手术亚组:后路短节段(PS)、后路长节段(PL)、关于后路短节段和长节段的报告(PSL)、前路(A)以及前路联合后路(AP)技术。对明确界定且普遍接受的参数进行评分并随后进行分析。比较了手术组术前损伤的严重程度。评估了所有组的神经、放射学和功能结果以及并发症。
共纳入132篇论文,大多数为回顾性病例系列,代表5748例患者。术前损伤严重程度显示各亚组之间存在差异。无论治疗选择如何,部分神经功能缺损都有可能恢复。所使用的五种技术均无法维持矫正后的后凸角度。手术后的功能结果似乎比普遍认为的要好。并发症相对较少。
一般而言,创伤性脊柱骨折的手术治疗是安全有效的。手术技术只能通过随机对照试验进行比较。