Getting a grip on guidelines: how to make them more relevant for practice.
作者信息
Grol Richard, van Weel Chris
出版信息
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e143-4. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420554.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Getting a grip on guidelines: how to make them more relevant for practice.把握指南：如何使其与实践更相关。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e143-4. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420554.
2
USPSTF: What's recommended, what's not.美国预防服务工作组（USPSTF）：推荐什么，不推荐什么。
J Fam Pract. 2014 May;63(5):265-9.
3
How do clinical practice guidelines go awry?临床实践指南是如何出错的？
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Sep 15;86(6):514-6.
4
From ABCs to GRADE: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's new rating system for clinical practice guidelines.从基础到分级：加拿大预防保健特别工作组针对临床实践指南的新评级系统
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):1282-9.
5
Use of evidence in hypertension guidelines: should we measure in both arms?高血压指南中证据的应用：我们应该双侧手臂都测量吗？
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Mar;59(560):e87-92. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X395012.
6
[Guideline development for general medicine: the problem of dichotomized algorithm development].[普通医学指南制定：二分法算法开发问题]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Aug;95(8):561-6.
7
Why can't we answer our questions?为什么我们不能回答我们的问题？
J Fam Pract. 2001 Nov;50(11):974-5.
8
["EbM guidelines for primary care": first experience with implementation and acceptance].["基层医疗循证医学指南"：实施与接受方面的首次经验]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2008.12.020.
9
Challenges to evidence-based prescribing in clinical practice.临床实践中循证用药面临的挑战。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):704-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K283. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
10
Assessing guidelines for use in family practice.评估家庭医疗中使用的指南。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Nov;50(11):969-73.
引用本文的文献
1
Hope for "Continued Vitality": Qualitative Study of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury and Low Mood on Their Rehabilitation.对“持续活力”的期望：对患有创伤性脑损伤且情绪低落的成年人康复情况的定性研究
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 22;3:848575. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.848575. eCollection 2022.
2
General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for patient care.全科医生对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病和创伤后应激障碍的认知与管理：对患者护理的启示
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:82. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0491-2.
3
Communicating risk using absolute risk reduction or prolongation of life formats: cluster-randomised trial in general practice.采用绝对风险降低或生命延长形式传达风险：全科医疗中的整群随机试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Apr;64(621):e199-207. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677824.
4
Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.纳入患者视角：对植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗临床实践指南的批判性综述
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;36(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9762-6. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
5
Hypertension and lifestyle modification: how useful are the guidelines?高血压与生活方式改善：指南有多大作用？
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Dec;60(581):879-80. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X544014.
6
Getting a grip on guidelines: occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria.把握指南：职业性接触性皮炎和荨麻疹
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jun;60(575):398-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X502074.
本文引用的文献
1
How could depression guidelines be made more relevant and applicable to primary care? A quantitative and qualitative review of national guidelines.抑郁症指南如何才能更贴合基层医疗并更具适用性？对国家指南的定量与定性综述。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e149-56. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420581.
2
3
Beyond the evidence of guidelines.超越指南的证据。
Neth J Med. 2009 Feb;67(2):39-40.
4
Treatment of depression in primary care.基层医疗中抑郁症的治疗。
BMJ. 2009 Mar 19;338:b934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b934.
5
Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.英国质量与结果框架中激励使用的抑郁症严重程度问卷的患者与医生观点：定性研究
BMJ. 2009 Mar 19;338:b663. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b663.
6
A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD.一份关于呼吸系统疾病指南制定的愿景声明：以慢性阻塞性肺疾病为例。
Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):774-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61347-1. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
7
Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.欧洲乳腺癌护理跨境合作的可能性：关于乳腺癌指南的内容、质量和证据使用的比较分析
Breast. 2008 Oct;17(5):464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 May 1.
8
Antibiotic prescribing in primary care: first choice and restrictive prescribing are two different traits.基层医疗中的抗生素处方：一线选择处方和限制性处方是两种不同的特性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):105-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018580.
9
Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada.高质量指南的特征：对十个欧洲国家和加拿大制定的86项临床指南的评估
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):148-57. doi: 10.1017/s026646230300014x.
10
Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries.内部指南：13个国家糖尿病指南中推荐意见与证据的比较分析
Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):1933-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1933.
Zotero 插件