Suppr超能文献

间接荧光抗体试验与外斐氏试验检测立克次体抗体的比较

Comparison between indirect fluorescent antibody and Weil-Felix tests for detecting antibodies against rickettsia.

作者信息

Bhattacharya D, Mittal V, Bhatia R, Sehgal S, Passey M N

机构信息

National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Delhi.

出版信息

J Commun Dis. 1991 Jun;23(2):144-8.

PMID:1940221
Abstract

Comparative evaluation of indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and Weil-Felix test (WFT) was carried out for detecting rickettsial antibodies in 102 patients with pyrexia of unknown origin (P.U.O.), 20 brucellosis cases and 20 normal healthy controls (N.H.C.). Of 102 sera of cases with P.U.O., antibodies against rickettsia could be detected in 11 (10.7 per cent) cases by IFAT and in 10 (9.8 per cent) cases by WFT, but amongst these 10 sera, antibodies could be detected only in six by IFAT. All 20 brucella positive sera were negative for rickettsia by IFAT but by WFT in 6 sera antibodies against rickettsia could be detected and 20 N.H.C. sera were negative by both the tests. Thus the advantages of IFAT over WFT in detecting antibodies against rickettsia in terms of sensitivity and specificity make it a more reliable test.

摘要

对102例不明原因发热(PUO)患者、20例布鲁氏菌病患者和20例正常健康对照(NHC)进行了间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)和外斐试验(WFT)检测立克次体抗体的比较评估。在102例PUO患者的血清中,通过IFAT在11例(10.7%)患者中检测到抗立克次体抗体,通过WFT在10例(9.8%)患者中检测到抗立克次体抗体,但在这10份血清中,仅通过IFAT在6例中检测到抗体。所有20份布鲁氏菌阳性血清通过IFAT检测立克次体均为阴性,但通过WFT在6份血清中检测到抗立克次体抗体,20份NHC血清两种检测均为阴性。因此,就敏感性和特异性而言,IFAT在检测抗立克次体抗体方面优于WFT,使其成为更可靠的检测方法。

相似文献

5
[Weil-Felix test].
Nihon Rinsho. 2005 Jul;63 Suppl 7:146-8.
7
Evaluation of serological tests for the diagnosis of rickettsiosis in Denmark.丹麦用于诊断立克次体病的血清学检测评估
J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Mar;76(3):285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fundus Examination: A Key to Spot the Spotted Fever!眼底检查:发现斑疹热的关键!
Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Sep;83(9):1020-1. doi: 10.1007/s12098-016-2066-6. Epub 2016 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验