Giovannetti Erin R, Wolff Jennifer L, Frick Kevin D, Boult Chad
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):1011-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00542.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
To assess the validity of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire as adapted for caregiving (WPAI:CG) to measure productivity loss (hours missed from work, impairment while at work, and impairment in regular activities) due to unpaid caregiving for medically complex older adults.
The WPAI:CG was administered along with the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) to a caregiving population (N = 308) enrolled with their older, medically complex care-recipient in a cluster-randomized controlled study. Correlation coefficients were calculated between each productivity variable derived from the WPAI:CG and CSI/CESD scores. Nonparametric tests for trend across ordered groups were carried out to examine the relationship between each productivity variable and the intensity of the caregiving.
Significant positive correlations were found between work productivity loss and caregiving-related strain (r = 0.45) and depression (r = 0.30). Measures of productivity loss were also highly associated with caregiving intensity (P < 0.05) and care-recipient medical care use (P < 0.05). The average employed caregiver reported 1.5 hours absence from work in the previous week and 18.5% reduced productivity while at work due to caregiving. Employed and nonemployed caregivers reported 27.2% reduced productivity in regular activities in the previous week.
The results indicate high convergent validity of the WPAI:CG questionnaire. This measure could facilitate research on the cost-effectiveness of caregiver-workplace interventions and provide employers and policy experts with a more accurate and comprehensive estimate of caregiving-related costs incurred by employers and society.
评估适用于照护工作的工作效率与活动受限问卷(WPAI:CG),以衡量因对患有复杂疾病的老年人进行无偿照护而导致的生产力损失(工作缺勤时长、工作时的效率受损以及日常活动的受限)。
在一项整群随机对照研究中,对308名照护者及其患有复杂疾病的老年受照护者进行了WPAI:CG问卷调查,同时还进行了照护者压力指数(CSI)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CESD)的调查。计算了WPAI:CG得出的每个生产力变量与CSI/CESD得分之间的相关系数。对有序组进行非参数趋势检验,以研究每个生产力变量与照护强度之间的关系。
发现工作生产力损失与照护相关压力(r = 0.45)和抑郁(r = 0.30)之间存在显著正相关。生产力损失的衡量指标也与照护强度(P < 0.05)和受照护者的医疗护理使用情况(P < 0.05)高度相关。平均而言,有工作的照护者报告前一周缺勤1.5小时,工作时因照护导致生产力下降18.5%。有工作和无工作的照护者均报告前一周日常活动的生产力下降了27.2%。
结果表明WPAI:CG问卷具有较高的聚合效度。该测量方法有助于研究照护者 - 工作场所干预措施的成本效益,并为雇主和政策专家提供更准确、全面的雇主和社会承担的与照护相关成本的估计。