Khanna A K, Singh M R, Khanna S, Khanna N N
Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.
J Indian Med Assoc. 1991 Jul;89(7):192-5.
Fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and tru-cut needle biopsy were performed in 86 patients with breast lump and the results of these techniques were finally compared with the incisional or excisional biopsy in all the patients. Fine needle aspiration cytology had the sensitivity of 96.8% and specificity of 100%, the imprint cytology had the sensitivity of 98.4% and specificity of 100%. While the tru-cut needle biopsy had the sensitivity and specificity of 100% though in this technique 15 of 86 (17.4%) specimens were rejected as insufficient for any diagnosis.
对86例乳腺肿块患者进行了细针穿刺细胞学检查、印片细胞学检查和粗针穿刺活检,并最终将这些技术的结果与所有患者的切取活检或切除活检结果进行了比较。细针穿刺细胞学检查的敏感性为96.8%,特异性为100%;印片细胞学检查的敏感性为98.4%,特异性为100%。而粗针穿刺活检的敏感性和特异性均为100%,不过在该技术中,86份标本中有15份(17.4%)因不足以做出任何诊断而被拒收。