Sparsø T, Grarup N, Andreasen C, Albrechtsen A, Holmkvist J, Andersen G, Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Madsbad S, Hansen T, Pedersen O
Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 1, Gentofte, Denmark.
Diabetologia. 2009 Jul;52(7):1308-14. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1362-3. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The list of validated type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants has recently been expanded from three to 19. The variants identified are common and have low penetrance in the general population. The aim of the study is to investigate the combined effect of the 19 variants by applying receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to demonstrate the discriminatory value between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetes patients in a cross-sectional population of Danes.
The 19 variants were genotyped in three study populations: the population-based Inter99 study; the ADDITION study; and additional type 2 diabetic patients and glucose-tolerant individuals. The case-control studies involved 4,093 type 2 diabetic patients and 5,302 glucose-tolerant individuals.
Single-variant analyses demonstrated allelic odds ratios ranging from 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11) to 1.33 (95% CI 1.22-1.45). When combining the 19 variants, subgroups with extreme risk profiles showed a threefold difference in the risk of type 2 diabetes (lower 10% carriers with < or =15 risk alleles vs upper 10% carriers with > or =22 risk alleles, OR 2.93 (95% CI 2.38-3.62, p = 1.6 x 10(-25)). We calculated the area under a ROC curve to estimate the discrimination rate between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetes patients based on the 19 variants. We found an area under the ROC curve of 0.60. Two-way gene-gene interaction showed few nominal interaction effects.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Combined analysis of the 19 validated variants enables detection of subgroups at substantially increased risk of type 2 diabetes; however, the discrimination between glucose-tolerant and type 2 diabetes individuals is still too inaccurate to achieve clinical value.
目的/假设:已验证的2型糖尿病易感性变异列表最近已从3个扩展到19个。所鉴定的变异在普通人群中很常见且外显率低。本研究的目的是通过应用受试者工作特征(ROC)来研究这19个变异的联合效应,以证明在丹麦横断面人群中糖耐量正常个体与2型糖尿病患者之间的鉴别价值。
在三个研究人群中对这19个变异进行基因分型:基于人群的Inter99研究;ADDITION研究;以及额外的2型糖尿病患者和糖耐量正常个体。病例对照研究涉及4093名2型糖尿病患者和5302名糖耐量正常个体。
单变异分析显示等位基因优势比范围为1.04(95%CI 0.98 - 1.11)至1.33(95%CI 1.22 - 1.45)。当合并这19个变异时,具有极端风险特征的亚组在2型糖尿病风险上显示出三倍差异(风险等位基因≤15个的最低10%携带者与风险等位基因≥22个的最高10%携带者相比,OR 2.93(95%CI 2.38 - 3.62,p = 1.6×10⁻²⁵))。我们计算了ROC曲线下面积,以基于这19个变异估计糖耐量正常个体与2型糖尿病患者之间的鉴别率。我们发现ROC曲线下面积为0.60。双向基因 - 基因相互作用显示出很少的名义相互作用效应。
结论/解读:对19个已验证变异的联合分析能够检测出2型糖尿病风险大幅增加的亚组;然而,糖耐量正常个体与2型糖尿病个体之间的鉴别仍然不够准确,无法实现临床价值。