Skubitz Keith M, Manivel J Carlos, Clohisy Denis R, Frolich Jerry W
Department of Medicine, The University of Minnesota Medical School, The Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;64(3):635-40. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1010-0. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
Aggressive fibromatosis (AF) is usually a slowly growing locally invasive tumor, but may exhibit a much more aggressive phenotype. The role of chemotherapy in AF is not well defined, but can be useful in some cases. We examined the response of a case to both imatinib and sunitinib.
We report a case of an aggressive multicentric extra-abdominal AF that was responsive to sunitinib, but resistant to imatinib.
A 23-year-old woman developed painful multifocal AF of both legs and gluteal muscles that progressed after surgery and treatment with methotrexate/vinblastine and pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin. She received six cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide (IMV), and obtained a good response with elimination of pain. After 5 months, she developed progression and again received six cycles of IMV, with cessation of symptoms. After 13 months, tumors recurred. Although the AF was symptomatic and progressing, she was hesitant to receive chemotherapy and began treatment with sunitinib 50 mg/day for 28 days of a 42-day cycle. At 4 months, she could walk on her heels without pain. After 13 months of sunitinib, therapy was changed to imatinib 400 mg/day; after 7 days she noticed increasing pain in the AF lesions and decreased knee flexibility. Imatinib was continued, but after 2 months of imatinib, she could only walk a few steps due to pain. Sunitinib was reinstituted at 37.5 mg/day and symptoms improved within 1.5 weeks, with a marked reduction of symptoms at 1 month. She was doing well with a normal activity level, 32 months after initially beginning sunitinib.
We conclude that sunitinib may be useful in some cases of AF.
侵袭性纤维瘤病(AF)通常是一种生长缓慢的局部侵袭性肿瘤,但可能表现出更具侵袭性的表型。化疗在AF中的作用尚不明确,但在某些情况下可能有用。我们研究了1例AF病例对伊马替尼和舒尼替尼的反应。
我们报告1例侵袭性多中心腹外AF病例,该病例对舒尼替尼有反应,但对伊马替尼耐药。
一名23岁女性出现双腿和臀肌疼痛性多灶性AF,术后经甲氨蝶呤/长春碱及聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素治疗后病情进展。她接受了6个周期的异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷(IMV)治疗,疼痛消除,反应良好。5个月后,病情进展,她再次接受6个周期的IMV治疗,症状消失。13个月后,肿瘤复发。尽管AF有症状且在进展,但她对接受化疗犹豫不决,开始接受舒尼替尼治疗,剂量为50mg/天,每42天周期服用28天。4个月时,她可以足跟行走且无疼痛。舒尼替尼治疗13个月后,改为伊马替尼400mg/天;7天后,她注意到AF病灶疼痛加剧,膝关节灵活性下降。继续使用伊马替尼,但使用2个月后,因疼痛她只能行走几步。重新使用舒尼替尼,剂量为37.5mg/天,1.5周内症状改善,1个月时症状明显减轻。最初开始使用舒尼替尼32个月后,她活动水平正常,情况良好。
我们得出结论,舒尼替尼在某些AF病例中可能有用。