Armiger Robert S, Armand Mehran, Tallroth Kaj, Lepistö Jyri, Mears Simon C
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Acta Orthop. 2009 Apr;80(2):155-61. doi: 10.3109/17453670902947390.
Because of the varying structure of dysplastic hips, the optimal realignment of the joint during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may differ between patients. Three-dimensional (3D) mechanical and radiological analysis possibly accounts better for patient-specific morphology, and may improve and automate optimal joint realignment.
We evaluated the 10-year outcomes of 12 patients following PAO. We compared 3D mechanical analysis results to both radiological and clinical measurements. A 3D discrete-element analysis algorithm was used to calculate the pre- and postoperative contact pressure profile within the hip. Radiological angles describing the coverage of the joint were measured using a computerized approach at actual and theoretical orientations of the acetabular cup. Quantitative results were compared using postoperative clinical evaluation scores (Harris score), and patient-completed outcome surveys (q-score) done at 2 and 10 years.
The 3D mechanical analysis indicated that peak joint contact pressure was reduced by an average factor of 1.7 subsequent to PAO. Lateral coverage of the femoral head increased in all patients; however, it did not proportionally reduce the maximum contact pressure and, in 1 case, the pressure increased. This patient had the lowest 10-year q-score (70 out of 100) of the cohort. Another hip was converted to hip arthroplasty after 3 years because of increasing osteoarthritis.
The 3D analysis showed that a reduction in contact pressure was theoretically possible for all patients in this cohort, but this could not be achieved in every case during surgery. While intraoperative factors may affect the actual surgical outcome, the results show that 3D contact pressure analysis is consistent with traditional PAO planning techniques (more so than 2D analysis) and may be a valuable addition to preoperative planning and intraoperative assessment of joint realignment.
由于发育异常髋关节的结构各异,髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)期间关节的最佳重新定位在不同患者之间可能有所不同。三维(3D)力学和放射学分析可能更能体现患者特异性形态,并且可能改善并自动化最佳关节重新定位。
我们评估了12例接受PAO患者的10年随访结果。我们将3D力学分析结果与放射学和临床测量结果进行了比较。使用3D离散元分析算法计算髋关节术前和术后的接触压力分布。在髋臼杯的实际和理论方向上,采用计算机化方法测量描述关节覆盖情况的放射学角度。使用术后临床评估评分(Harris评分)以及在2年和10年时患者完成的结果调查问卷(q评分)对定量结果进行比较。
3D力学分析表明,PAO后关节峰值接触压力平均降低了1.7倍。所有患者股骨头的外侧覆盖均增加;然而,它并未成比例地降低最大接触压力,并且在1例患者中压力升高。该患者是队列中10年q评分最低的(100分制中的70分)。另一例髋关节在3年后因骨关节炎加重而改行髋关节置换术。
3D分析表明,该队列中的所有患者理论上都有可能降低接触压力,但在手术过程中并非在每种情况下都能实现。虽然术中因素可能会影响实际手术结果,但结果表明3D接触压力分析与传统的PAO规划技术一致(比二维分析更一致),并且可能是术前规划和术中关节重新定位评估的有价值补充。