Sutton Paul A, Humes David J, Purcell Gemma, Smith Janette K, Whiting Frances, Wright Tom, Morgan Linda, Lobo Dileep N
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jul;91(5):381-4. doi: 10.1308/003588409X392135. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
We aimed to evaluate the role of routine measurements of serum amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.
We identified all patients who had serum amylase and lipase assays over a 62-day period at a single university teaching hospital and reviewed their case notes.
We excluded 58 of the 1598 patients on grounds of ineligibility (< 18 years of age and those transferred from other hospitals). A complete data set was obtained for 1520 (98.7%) of the remaining 1540 patients. Only 9.1% of requests were based on a clinical suspicion of acute pancreatitis. Of the 44 (2.9%) patients who had acute pancreatitis, only 28 (63.6%) had an associated rise in serum amylase and/or lipase 3 times above the maximum reference range, the remainder being diagnosed radiologically. At this cut-off range, the sensitivity and specificity for serum amylase were 50% and 99%, and those for serum lipase 64% and 97%, respectively.
Routine measurements of serum amylase and lipase are unhelpful in the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain unless there is clinical suspicion of acute pancreatitis. In these patients, assay of lipase alone is preferable to assay of amylase alone or both enzymes.
我们旨在评估血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶的常规检测在急性腹痛诊断中的作用。
我们确定了一所大学教学医院在62天内进行血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶检测的所有患者,并查阅了他们的病历。
我们以不符合条件(年龄<18岁以及从其他医院转来的患者)为由,排除了1598例患者中的58例。其余1540例患者中有1520例(98.7%)获得了完整的数据集。只有9.1%的检测申请是基于急性胰腺炎的临床怀疑。在44例(2.9%)患有急性胰腺炎的患者中,只有28例(63.6%)血清淀粉酶和/或脂肪酶升高至最高参考范围的3倍以上,其余患者通过影像学诊断。在此临界范围内,血清淀粉酶的敏感性和特异性分别为50%和99%,血清脂肪酶的敏感性和特异性分别为64%和97%。
血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶的常规检测对急性腹痛的诊断并无帮助,除非存在急性胰腺炎的临床怀疑。对于这些患者,单独检测脂肪酶优于单独检测淀粉酶或同时检测两种酶。