• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用实验室规模的序批式反应器评估同步营养物去除和污泥减量效果。

Evaluation of simultaneous nutrient removal and sludge reduction using laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors.

作者信息

Datta Tania, Liu Yanjie, Goel Ramesh

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 122 South Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2009 Jul;76(5):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.040. Epub 2009 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.040
PMID:19409599
Abstract

The treatment and disposal of excess sludge has been a rising challenge for wastewater treatment plants worldwide. In this study, simultaneous sludge reduction and nutrient removal was evaluated in laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Two SBRs were operated alongside for a duration of 370d. One SBR was operated to achieve nutrient removal (control-SBR) at 10d solids retention time (SRT), while the other (modified-SBR) was operated to achieve nutrient removal along with sludge reduction. Sludge reduction in the modified-SBR was accomplished by subjecting the recycled biomass to feasting and fasting at sufficiently high SRT close to infinity (phase I and II) and finite SRT (phase III). The observed biomass yield in the modified-SBR was estimated to be 0.17mg TSSmg(-1) COD, representing 63% sludge reduction compared to the control-SBR. The NH(3) levels in the effluents from both SBRs always remained below detection limit. The average dissolved phosphorus removal efficiencies in the control-SBR and the modified-SBR were 87% and 84%, respectively, during phase II. However, the biomass of the modified-SBR increased during phase II. To control this, biomass wastage was initiated directly from the modified-SBR during phase III at a rate equivalent to the observed biomass accumulation rate in the system in phase II. This resulted in an overall 100d SRT for the modified-SBR system. Following this change, biomass accumulation in the modified-SBR was controlled, and a net 63% sludge reduction could be sustained along with 90% phosphorus and 100% NH3 removal. Consistent denitrification activities were also noticed in both SBRs despite the absence of any carbon source during the anoxic phase of every cycle.

摘要

剩余污泥的处理与处置一直是全球污水处理厂面临的日益严峻的挑战。在本研究中,在实验室规模的序批式反应器(SBR)中评估了同步污泥减量和营养物去除效果。两个SBR同时运行370天。一个SBR在10天的固体停留时间(SRT)下运行以实现营养物去除(对照SBR),而另一个(改良SBR)运行以实现营养物去除并同时进行污泥减量。改良SBR中的污泥减量是通过使循环生物量在足够高的接近无穷大的SRT(第一阶段和第二阶段)和有限的SRT(第三阶段)下进行“ feast and fasting”来实现的。改良SBR中观察到的生物量产率估计为0.17mg TSSmg(-1) COD,与对照SBR相比,污泥减量达63%。两个SBR出水的NH(3) 水平始终低于检测限。在第二阶段,对照SBR和改良SBR中溶解磷的平均去除效率分别为87%和84%。然而,改良SBR的生物量在第二阶段有所增加。为控制这一情况,在第三阶段直接从改良SBR中以与系统在第二阶段观察到的生物量积累速率相当的速率进行生物量排放。这使得改良SBR系统的总SRT为100天。在此变化之后,改良SBR中的生物量积累得到控制,并且可以维持63%的净污泥减量以及90%的磷去除率和100%的NH3去除率。尽管在每个周期的缺氧阶段没有任何碳源,但两个SBR中也都观察到了持续的反硝化活性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of simultaneous nutrient removal and sludge reduction using laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors.使用实验室规模的序批式反应器评估同步营养物去除和污泥减量效果。
Chemosphere. 2009 Jul;76(5):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.040. Epub 2009 May 5.
2
Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) for biological nutrient removal from simulated wastewater containing glucose as carbon source.序批式反应器(SBR)和序批式生物膜反应器(SBBR)用于去除以葡萄糖为碳源的模拟废水中生物营养物的评估。
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(3):73-9.
3
Carbon mass balance and microbial ecology in a laboratory scale reactor achieving simultaneous sludge reduction and nutrient removal.实验室规模反应器中实现同步污泥减量和养分去除的碳质量平衡和微生物生态学。
Water Res. 2014 Apr 15;53:153-67. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
4
Demonstration of enhanced nutrient removal at two full-scale SBR plants.两座全尺寸序批式活性污泥法(SBR)处理厂强化营养物去除的示范项目
Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(10):115-20.
5
Application of excess activated sludge ozonation in an SBR Plant. Effects on substrate fractioning and solids production.过量活性污泥臭氧化在序批式反应器(SBR)处理厂中的应用。对底物分级和固体产物的影响。
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(1):239-45. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.656.
6
Mass balance of nitrogen, and estimates of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus used in microbial synthesis as a function of sludge retention time in a sequencing batch reactor system.在序批式反应器系统中,氮的质量平衡以及作为污泥停留时间函数的微生物合成中化学需氧量、氮和磷的用量估算。
Bioresour Technol. 2008 Nov;99(16):7788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.057. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
7
Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge.在序批式活性污泥法(SBR)中利用好氧颗粒污泥去除屠宰场废水中的氮和磷
Water Res. 2005 Nov;39(19):4817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.025. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
8
Biological nutrient removal from meat processing wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor.使用序批式反应器从肉类加工废水中进行生物营养物去除。
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(10):101-8.
9
Kinetic model of a granular sludge SBR: influences on nutrient removal.颗粒污泥序批式反应器的动力学模型:对营养物去除的影响
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jul 1;97(4):801-15. doi: 10.1002/bit.21196.
10
Development of a 2-sludge, 3-stage system for nitrogen and phosphorous removal from nutrient-rich wastewater using granular sludge and biofilms.开发一种两污泥、三阶段系统,利用颗粒污泥和生物膜从富营养化废水中去除氮和磷。
Water Res. 2008 Jun;42(12):3207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The investigation of biological removal of nitrogen and phosphorous from domestic wastewater by inserting anaerobic/anoxic holding tank in the return sludge line of MLE-OSA modified system.通过在MLE-OSA改良系统的回流污泥管线中插入厌氧/缺氧储水池对生活污水进行生物脱氮除磷的研究。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020 Jan 16;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40201-019-00419-1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Strict anaerobic side-stream reactor: effect of the sludge interchange ratio on sludge reduction in a biological nutrient removal process.严格的厌氧侧流反应器:污泥交换率对生物脱氮除磷工艺中污泥减量化的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(2):1243-1256. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0448-6. Epub 2017 Oct 30.