• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在应急准备桌面演练中评估公共卫生能力:一种测量工具的信度和效度

Assessing public health capabilities during emergency preparedness tabletop exercises: reliability and validity of a measurement tool.

作者信息

Savoia Elena, Testa Marcia A, Biddinger Paul D, Cadigan Rebecca O, Koh Howard, Campbell Paul, Stoto Michael A

机构信息

Center for Public Health Preparedness, Division of Public Health Practice, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;124(1):138-48. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400117.

DOI:10.1177/003335490912400117
PMID:19413036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2602939/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Improving the ability of local public health agencies to respond to large-scale emergencies is an ongoing challenge. Tabletop exercises can provide an opportunity for individuals and groups to practice coordination of emergency response and evaluate performance. The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable self-assessment performance measurement tool for tabletop exercise participants.

METHODS

The study population comprised 179 public officials who attended three tabletop exercises in Massachusetts and Maine between September 2005 and November 2006. A 42-item questionnaire was developed to assess five public health functional capabilities: (1) leadership and management, (2) mass casualty care, (3) communication, (4) disease control and prevention, and (5) surveillance and epidemiology. Analyses were undertaken to examine internal consistency, associations among scales, the empirical structure of the items, and inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven questions were retained in the final questionnaire and grouped according to the original five domains. Alpha coefficients were 0.81 or higher for all scales. The five-factor solution from the principal components analysis accounted for 60% of the total variance, and the factor structure was consistent with the five domains of the original conceptual model. Inter-rater agreement ranged from good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting 37-item performance measurement tool was found to reliably measure public health functional capabilities in a tabletop exercise setting, with preliminary evidence of a factor structure consistent with the original conceptualization and of criterion-related validity.

摘要

目的

提高地方公共卫生机构应对大规模突发事件的能力是一项持续的挑战。桌面演练可为个人和团体提供实践应急响应协调及评估绩效的机会。本研究的目的是为桌面演练参与者开发一种有效且可靠的自我评估绩效测量工具。

方法

研究对象包括179名公职人员,他们于2005年9月至2006年11月期间在马萨诸塞州和缅因州参加了三次桌面演练。编制了一份包含42个条目的问卷,以评估五项公共卫生功能能力:(1)领导与管理,(2)大规模伤亡护理,(3)沟通,(4)疾病控制与预防,以及(5)监测与流行病学。进行分析以检验内部一致性、各量表之间的关联、条目的实证结构以及评分者间的一致性。

结果

最终问卷保留了37个问题,并根据最初的五个领域进行了分组。所有量表的阿尔法系数均为0.81或更高。主成分分析得出的五因素解决方案解释了总方差的60%,且因素结构与原始概念模型的五个领域一致。评分者间的一致性从良好到优秀不等。

结论

结果显示,所得到的37个条目的绩效测量工具能够在桌面演练环境中可靠地测量公共卫生功能能力,初步证据表明其因素结构与原始概念化一致且具有与标准相关的效度。

相似文献

1
Assessing public health capabilities during emergency preparedness tabletop exercises: reliability and validity of a measurement tool.在应急准备桌面演练中评估公共卫生能力:一种测量工具的信度和效度
Public Health Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;124(1):138-48. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400117.
2
Inter-agency communication and operations capabilities during a hospital functional exercise: reliability and validity of a measurement tool.机构间沟通和运作能力在医院功能演练期间:测量工具的可靠性和有效性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):52-8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00007664.
3
Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats.设计并开展桌面演练,以评估针对人为和自然发生的生物威胁的公共卫生应急准备情况。
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 29;7:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-92.
4
Using tabletop exercises to evaluate nurses' clinical performance of hazardous materials disaster management: A cross-sectional study.运用桌面演练评估护士在危险物品灾害管理方面的临床表现:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104358. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104358. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Emergency medical technicians' disaster training by tabletop exercise.通过桌面演练对急救医疗技术人员进行灾难培训。
Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;19(5):433-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.24467.
6
Extending the Reach of Pediatric Emergency Preparedness: A Virtual Tabletop Exercise Targeting Children's Needs.延伸儿科急诊准备范围:以儿童需求为目标的虚拟桌面演练。
Public Health Rep. 2019 Jul-Aug;134(4):344-353. doi: 10.1177/0033354919849880. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Promoting community preparedness: lessons learned from the implementation of a chemical disaster tabletop exercise.促进社区应急准备:从化学灾难桌面演练实施中汲取的经验教训
Health Promot Pract. 2010 May;11(3):310-19. doi: 10.1177/1524839908325063. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
8
Development of a survey instrument to measure connectivity to evaluate national public health preparedness and response performance.开发一种用于衡量连通性的调查工具,以评估国家公共卫生防备和应对绩效。
Public Health Rep. 2007 May-Jun;122(3):329-38. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200306.
9
Addressing Children's Needs in Disasters: A Regional Pediatric Tabletop Exercise.应对灾害中的儿童需求:一次区域儿科桌面演练
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Oct;12(5):582-586. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.137. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
10
Mental health emergency preparedness: the need for training and coordination at the state level.心理健康应急准备:州层面培训与协调的必要性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):199-204; discussion 205-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00004659.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring pandemic preparedness through public perception and its impact on health service quality, attitudes, and healthcare image.通过公众认知探索大流行防范及其对医疗服务质量、态度和医疗保健形象的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95488-8.
2
Malaria Elimination in China: Improving County-Level Malaria Personnel Knowledge of the 1-3-7 Strategy through Tabletop Exercises.中国消除疟疾:通过桌面演练提高县级疟疾人员对 1-3-7 策略的认识。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr;102(4):804-810. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0560.
3
How prepared are we for cross-border outbreaks? An exploratory analysis of cross-border response networks for outbreaks of multidrug resistant microorganisms in the Netherlands and Germany.我们对跨境疫情爆发做好准备了吗?对荷兰和德国耐多药微生物疫情跨境应对网络的探索性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219548. eCollection 2019.
4
Population Health Adaptation Approaches to the Increasing Severity and Frequency of Weather-Related Disasters Resulting From our Changing Climate: A Literature Review and Application to Charleston, South Carolina.人口健康适应气候变化导致的日益严重和频繁的与天气有关的灾害的方法:文献综述及南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿的应用。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Dec;5(4):439-452. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0223-y.
5
Meta-evaluation of published studies on evaluation of health disaster preparedness exercises through a systematic review.通过系统评价对已发表的关于卫生应急演练评估研究的元评价
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Jan 10;7:15. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_159_17. eCollection 2018.
6
The evidence base of primary research in public health emergency preparedness: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation.突发公共卫生事件准备中的基础研究证据:范围综述和利益相关者咨询。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1750-1.
7
Incorporating research and evaluation into pandemic influenza vaccination preparedness and response.将研究与评估纳入大流行性流感疫苗接种的准备和应对工作中。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;20(4):713-714. doi: 10.3201/eid2004.140224.
8
Emergency management in health: key issues and challenges in the UK.卫生应急管理:英国的关键问题与挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 19;12:884. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-884.
9
Hospital Incident Command System (HICS) performance in Iran; decision making during disasters.医院突发事件指挥系统(HICS)在伊朗的表现;灾害期间的决策。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 6;20:14. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-14.
10
Southeastern Center for Emerging Biologic Threats tabletop exercise: foodborne toxoplasmosis outbreak on college campuses.东南部新兴生物威胁中心桌面演练:大学校园食源性弓形虫病暴发
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Mar;10(1):89-97. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0040. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.有缺陷的自我评估:对健康、教育和工作场所的影响。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Dec;5(3):69-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
2
On linkages: using exercises to identify systems-level preparedness challenges.关于联系:运用练习来识别系统层面的准备工作挑战。
Public Health Rep. 2008 Jan-Feb;123(1):96-101. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300116.
3
Measuring the performance of telephone-based disease surveillance systems in local health departments.评估地方卫生部门基于电话的疾病监测系统的性能。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9):1706-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114710. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
4
Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats.设计并开展桌面演练,以评估针对人为和自然发生的生物威胁的公共卫生应急准备情况。
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 29;7:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-92.
5
Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness.公共卫生应急准备的概念化与定义。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114496. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
6
Public health preparedness: a systems-level approach.公共卫生防范:一种系统层面的方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):282-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.030783.
7
Public health preparedness: evolution or revolution?公共卫生防范:演进还是变革?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):935-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.935.
8
Integrating hospitals into community emergency preparedness planning.将医院纳入社区应急准备规划。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 6;144(11):799-811. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-11-200606060-00006.
9
A review of instruments assessing public health preparedness.一份关于评估公共卫生应急准备情况的工具综述。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;120(5):532-42. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000508.
10
Local variation in public health preparedness: lessons from California.公共卫生应急准备的地方差异:来自加利福尼亚州的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-341-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.341.