Yaseen Syed M, Subba Reddy V V
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, KBH Dental College, Nashik, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):33-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.50814.
The present study was undertaken to compare and evaluate shear bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth.
Flat dentin surface of 64 human anterior teeth (32 primary and 32 permanent) divided into four groups of 16 each. Groups A and C were treated with Contax (sixth generation), while groups B and D were treated with Clearfil S3 (seventh generation). A teflon mold was used to build the composite (Filtek Z-350) cylinders on the dentinal surface of all the specimens. Shear bond strength was tested for all the specimens with an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for multiple group comparison, followed by student's unpaired 't' test for group-wise comparison.
There was no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength among the study groups except that primary teeth bonded with Contax exhibited significantly lesser shear bond strength than permanent teeth bonded with Clearfil S3.
This study revealed that Clearfil S3 could be of greater advantage in pediatric dentistry than Contax because of its fewer steps and better shear bond strength in dentin of both primary and permanent teeth.
本研究旨在比较和评估两种自酸蚀粘结剂(第六代和第七代)在乳牙和恒牙牙本质上的剪切粘结强度。
64颗人前牙(32颗乳牙和32颗恒牙)的平坦牙本质表面被分成四组,每组16颗。A组和C组用Contax(第六代)处理,而B组和D组用Clearfil S3(第七代)处理。使用聚四氟乙烯模具在所有标本的牙本质表面构建复合树脂(Filtek Z - 350)圆柱体。用Instron万能材料试验机对所有标本进行剪切粘结强度测试。数据采用单向方差分析进行多组比较的统计学分析,随后采用学生非配对“t”检验进行组间比较。
各研究组之间的剪切粘结强度没有统计学上的显著差异,只是用Contax粘结的乳牙的剪切粘结强度明显低于用Clearfil S3粘结的恒牙。
本研究表明,Clearfil S3在儿童牙科中可能比Contax更具优势,因为它步骤更少,并且在乳牙和恒牙牙本质中的剪切粘结强度更好。