Suppr超能文献

四种粘结系统对乳牙本质粘结强度的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength of Four Adhesive Systems on Primary Dentin.

作者信息

Abedi Faezeh, Siahvoshi Sepehr, Babaei Mahdi, Nourmohammadi Shima

机构信息

General Dentist, Arak, Iran.

Dental Materials Research Center, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Oct;11(5):e70205. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70205.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of etch and rinse (Single Bond 2), two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE) and one-step self-etch (Go Bond SDI and G-Premio Bond) bonding agents applied to primary teeth, using a universal testing machine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sample was divided into four groups: Group A incorporated Single Bond 2, Group B constituted Clearfil SE, Group C constituted Go Bond SDI, and Group D constituted G-Premio Bond. In each group, 14 out of the total 56 primary canine teeth were considered. Composite restoration was performed using the identified bonding agents on the exposed dentin. A universal testing device was used to evaluate the shear bond strength of the samples. An ANOVA test was used to statistically analyze the obtained data.

RESULTS

By using Kruskal-Wallis test, and determining 0.0080 as the level of significance, shear bond strength with mean standard deviation (SD) was 44.76 ± 32.49 MPa, 92.87 ± 48.63 MPa, 18.55 ± 14.08 MPa, and 22.65 ± 7.74 for Single Bond 2, Clearfil SE, Go Bond SDI, and G-Premio Bond, respectively. Maximum shear bond strength was found in the two-step self-etch bonding agent.

CONCLUSION

Since dentin is involved in most of pediatric caries, especially in rampant caries, providing an appropriate bond has a great impact on a successful restoration treatment. Considering our results, two-step self-etch bonding agent (Clearfil SE bond) demonstrated superior shear bond strength in dentin of anterior primary teeth, over Single Bond 2, Go Bond SDI, and G-Premio bonds. To establish a correlation among various factors affecting bond efficacy, further in vitro and clinical investigations are necessary.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用万能试验机对应用于乳牙的酸蚀冲洗粘结剂(Single Bond 2)、两步自酸蚀粘结剂(Clearfil SE)和一步自酸蚀粘结剂(Go Bond SDI和G-Premio Bond)的剪切粘结强度进行比较评估。

材料与方法

样本分为四组:A组使用Single Bond 2,B组使用Clearfil SE,C组使用Go Bond SDI,D组使用G-Premio Bond。每组在总共56颗乳尖牙中选取14颗。使用选定的粘结剂在暴露的牙本质上进行复合树脂修复。使用万能测试装置评估样本的剪切粘结强度。采用方差分析对所得数据进行统计学分析。

结果

通过Kruskal-Wallis检验,将显著性水平确定为0.0080,Single Bond 2、Clearfil SE、Go Bond SDI和G-Premio Bond的剪切粘结强度(平均标准偏差[SD])分别为44.76±32.49MPa、92.87±48.63MPa、18.55±14.08MPa和22.65±7.74MPa。两步自酸蚀粘结剂的剪切粘结强度最高。

结论

由于牙本质在大多数儿童龋齿中都有涉及,尤其是在猖獗性龋齿中,提供合适的粘结对成功的修复治疗有很大影响。根据我们的结果,两步自酸蚀粘结剂(Clearfil SE粘结剂)在前牙乳牙牙本质中的剪切粘结强度优于Single Bond 2、Go Bond SDI和G-Premio粘结剂。为了确定影响粘结效果的各种因素之间的相关性,有必要进行进一步的体外和临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3d/12371717/aad066b9e62d/CRE2-11-e70205-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验