Suppr超能文献

两种经典方法与一种基于试剂盒的线粒体分离方法的关键比较。

A critical comparison between two classical and a kit-based method for mitochondria isolation.

作者信息

Hartwig Sonja, Feckler Christian, Lehr Stefan, Wallbrecht Katrin, Wolgast Heike, Müller-Wieland Dirk, Kotzka Jörg

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Proteomics. 2009 Jun;9(11):3209-14. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800344.

Abstract

Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free-flow electrophoresis or a commercially available kit-based method. Our analyses show that the sophisticated (and most expensive) free-flow electrophoresis method enables isolation of intact mitochondria with an enrichment of approximately 70%. Using the classical density centrifugation method is very laborious and time-consuming, but delivers about 57% intact mitochondria. Using standard laboratory equipment in a quick and simple procedure, the kit provides approximately 50% intact mitochondria, suitable for most standard investigations.

摘要

有许多分离线粒体的方案可供使用。在此,比较了三种从小鼠肝脏组织中分离完整线粒体的方法在产量、纯度和活性方面的差异。通过蔗糖密度梯度超速离心、自由流动电泳或基于市售试剂盒的方法分离线粒体。我们的分析表明,复杂(且最昂贵)的自由流动电泳方法能够分离出完整的线粒体,富集率约为70%。使用经典的密度离心法非常费力且耗时,但能得到约57%的完整线粒体。该试剂盒使用标准实验室设备,操作快速简单,能提供约50%的完整线粒体,适用于大多数标准研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验