• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in children: a case-control study.儿童腹部伤口裂开的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1509-13. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0058-7.
2
Risk factors for wound dehiscence after laparotomy - clinical control trial.剖腹术后伤口裂开的危险因素——临床对照试验
Pol Przegl Chir. 2012 Nov;84(11):565-73. doi: 10.2478/v10035-012-0094-0.
3
Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model.成人腹部切口裂开:风险模型的建立与验证。
World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y.
4
The legendary superior strength of the Pfannenstiel incision: a myth?耻骨联合上横切口久负盛名的超强优势:只是个神话?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1446-51. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106849.
5
Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients.初次及多次正中、横行及改良 Makuuchi 切口后发生的伤口并发症:696 例患者的单中心经验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 21;100(20):e25989. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025989.
6
Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy.剖腹术后腹部伤口裂开的预后模型
J Surg Res. 2003 Feb;109(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5.
7
Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.手术伤口裂开和切口疝危险因素的回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0.
8
Surgical site infection in abdominal trauma patients: risk prediction and performance of the NNIS and SENIC indexes.腹部创伤患者的手术部位感染:NNIS 和 SENIC 指标的风险预测和性能。
Can J Surg. 2011 Feb;54(1):17-24. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022109.
9
Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision.上腹部手术后切口疝:中线切口与横向切口的随机对照试验
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0469-7. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
10
[The effect of different lengths and placements of median laparotomy incision on wound dehiscence in the rat].[正中剖腹术切口的不同长度和位置对大鼠伤口裂开的影响]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 May;15(3):205-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Mass closure vs. layer-by-layer closure of transverse laparotomy in children: a randomized trial with ultrasound and elastography outcomes.儿童横切口剖腹术的整块缝合与分层缝合对比:一项关于超声和弹性成像结果的随机试验
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 13;13:1655851. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1655851. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors for stoma and incision complications of enterostomy in children with very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective cohort study.极早发型炎症性肠病患儿肠造口术造口及切口并发症的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 20;184(2):146. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05952-2.
3
Risk Factors for Dehiscence of Operative Incisions in Newborns after Laparotomy.剖腹术后新生儿切口裂开的危险因素。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Aug;34(4):351-362. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771223. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
4
Tissue adhesive, adhesive tape, and sutures for skin closure of paediatric surgical wounds: prospective randomized clinical trial.组织粘合剂、胶带和缝线在儿科手术伤口皮肤闭合中的应用:前瞻性随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1087-1095. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac254.
5
Early Outcome of Laparotomy Wounds in Pediatric Patients in TASH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Six-Months Prospective Study.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴 TASH 的儿科患者剖腹伤口的早期结局:一项为期六个月的前瞻性研究。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Jan;31(1):111-118. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i1.13.
6
Outcomes of early relaparotomy in pediatric patients at Tikur Anbessa teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective review.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提古安贝萨教学医院儿科患者早期再次剖腹手术的结果:一项为期五年的回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0436-x.
7
Dressings and Products in Pediatric Wound Care.儿科伤口护理中的敷料与产品
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Apr 1;3(4):324-334. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0477.
8
Noninfectious wound complications in clean surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and association with antibiotic use.清洁手术中的非感染性伤口并发症:流行病学、危险因素及与抗生素使用的关系。
World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0993-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative abdominal evisceration in children: possible risk factors.儿童术后腹腔脏器脱出:可能的危险因素
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Aug;22(8):677-80. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1722-8. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
2
Abdominal incisions in infants and children; a study of evisceration.婴幼儿腹部切口;内脏脱出的研究
Ann Surg. 1953 Mar;137(3):349-55. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195303000-00007.
3
Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.中线腹部切口缝合技术的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2002 Nov;89(11):1350-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x.
4
Neutrophil production and function in newborn infants.新生儿中性粒细胞的生成与功能
Br J Haematol. 2000 Jul;110(1):18-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01992.x.
5
Pediatric postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence: transverse versus vertical incisions.小儿术后腹部伤口裂开:横向切口与纵向切口对比
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jun;190(6):688-91. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00284-2.
6
The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.寻找理想的腹部筋膜闭合方法:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2000 Mar;231(3):436-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200003000-00018.
7
Infection determinants at extremes of age.极端年龄的感染决定因素。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Aug;34 Suppl A:1-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.suppl_a.1.
8
Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.重大胃肠道手术后的腹壁裂开和切口疝——三种缝合技术的比较
Eur J Surg. 1995 May;161(5):349-54.
9
Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: Influence on healing.中线剖腹术还是横切口剖腹术?一项随机对照临床试验。第一部分:对愈合的影响。
Br J Surg. 1980 Mar;67(3):188-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670308.
10
Wound healing in obstructive jaundice.梗阻性黄疸中的伤口愈合
Br J Surg. 1984 Apr;71(4):267-70. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710405.

儿童腹部伤口裂开的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。

Risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in children: a case-control study.

作者信息

van Ramshorst Gabriëlle H, Salu Nathalie E, Bax Nikolaas M A, Hop Wim C J, van Heurn Ernst, Aronson Daniel C, Lange Johan F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1509-13. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0058-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-009-0058-7
PMID:19418094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2691929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the limited literature concerning abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy in children, reported incidences range between 0.2-1.2% with associated mortality rates of 8-45%. The goal of this retrospective case-control study was to identify major risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Patients younger than aged 18 years who developed abdominal wound dehiscence in three pediatric surgical centers during the period 1985-2005 were identified. For each patient with abdominal wound dehiscence, four controls were selected by systematic random sampling. Patients with (a history of) open abdomen treatment or abdominal wound dehiscence were excluded as control subjects. Putative relevant patient-related, operation-related, and postoperative variables for both cases and control subjects were evaluated in univariate analyses and subsequently entered in multivariate stepwise logistic regression models to identify major independent predictors of abdominal wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

A total number of 63 patients with abdominal wound dehiscence and 252 control subjects were analyzed. Mean presentation of abdominal wound dehiscence was at postoperative day 5 (range, 1-15) and overall mortality was 11%. Hospital stay was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in the case group (median, 42 vs. 10 days). Major independent risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence were younger than aged 1 year, wound infection, median incision, and emergency surgery. Incisional hernia was reported in 12% of the patients with abdominal wound dehiscence versus 3% in the control group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal wound dehiscence is a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. Median incisions should be avoided whenever possible.

摘要

背景

在关于儿童剖腹手术后腹部伤口裂开的有限文献中,报道的发生率在0.2%至1.2%之间,相关死亡率为8%至45%。这项回顾性病例对照研究的目的是确定儿科人群腹部伤口裂开的主要危险因素。

方法

确定了1985年至2005年期间在三个儿科手术中心发生腹部伤口裂开的18岁以下患者。对于每例腹部伤口裂开患者,通过系统随机抽样选择四名对照。有开放腹部治疗史或腹部伤口裂开的患者被排除作为对照对象。对病例组和对照组假定相关的患者相关、手术相关和术后变量进行单因素分析,随后纳入多因素逐步逻辑回归模型,以确定腹部伤口裂开的主要独立预测因素。

结果

共分析了63例腹部伤口裂开患者和252例对照对象。腹部伤口裂开的平均出现时间为术后第5天(范围1至15天),总死亡率为11%。病例组的住院时间明显更长(p<0.001)(中位数,42天对10天)。腹部伤口裂开的主要独立危险因素为年龄小于1岁、伤口感染、正中切口和急诊手术。腹部伤口裂开患者中有12%报告发生切口疝,而对照组为3%(p = 0.001)。

结论

腹部伤口裂开是一种严重并发症,发病率和死亡率高。应尽可能避免正中切口。