• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重大胃肠道手术后的腹壁裂开和切口疝——三种缝合技术的比较

Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.

作者信息

Gislason H, Grønbech J E, Søreide O

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Bergen, Haukeland Hospital, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1995 May;161(5):349-54.

PMID:7662780
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional hernia after three different techniques of closure of the abdominal wall after major gastrointestinal operations.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital, Norway.

SUBJECTS

599 adults who underwent major operations for gastrointestinal conditions between December 1990 and February 1992.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised in three groups for abdominal wall closure by continuous mass polyglyconate (Maxon) double suture with loop, continuous mass polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), and interrupted polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) (layered for transverse and mass for midline incisions).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Burst abdomen during the postoperative period, and incisional hernia after one year follow up.

RESULTS

The incidence of wound dehiscence was 2% and of incisional hernia at one year 7%. There were no differences in the rate of dehiscence among the groups, but there were significantly more hernias in the polyglyconate group (19/164, 12%) compared with the two in which polyglactin 910 was used (16/327, 5%). Wound infections developed in 84/583 of our patients (14%) and the incidence was closely associated with emergency operations and contamination. Wound complications were not associated with the closure technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound infection is the most important single factor in the development of burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The continuous closure technique is quicker, cheaper, and as safe as the interrupted technique.

摘要

目的

比较三种不同的胃肠道大手术后腹壁关闭技术术后切口裂开和切口疝的发生率。

设计

前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

地点

挪威大学医院。

研究对象

1990年12月至1992年2月期间接受胃肠道疾病大手术的599名成年人。

干预措施

将患者随机分为三组,分别采用连续聚甘醇酸(Maxon)双缝合法带环缝闭腹壁、连续聚乳酸910(Vicryl)缝闭腹壁和间断聚乳酸910(Vicryl)缝闭腹壁(横行切口分层缝闭,正中切口连续缝闭)。

主要观察指标

术后切口裂开情况,以及随访一年后的切口疝情况。

结果

伤口裂开发生率为2%,一年后切口疝发生率为7%。各组之间的裂开率没有差异,但聚甘醇酸组的疝发生率显著高于使用聚乳酸910的两组(19/164,12%对比16/327,5%)。84/583例患者发生了伤口感染(14%),其发生率与急诊手术和污染密切相关。伤口并发症与关闭技术无关。

结论

伤口感染是切口裂开和切口疝发生的最重要单一因素。连续缝闭技术更快、更便宜,且与间断缝闭技术一样安全。

相似文献

1
Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.重大胃肠道手术后的腹壁裂开和切口疝——三种缝合技术的比较
Eur J Surg. 1995 May;161(5):349-54.
2
Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.胃肠道大手术后腹壁裂开的闭合——不同手术技术的比较及切口疝的后期发展
Eur J Surg. 1999 Oct;165(10):958-61. doi: 10.1080/110241599750008071.
3
Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.影响腹部切口裂开发生率的机械因素。
Eur J Surg. 1995 Sep;161(9):655-61.
4
Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial.聚乙醇酸缝线(美生)与尼龙缝线用于腹部正中切口缝合的前瞻性随机试验。
Am Surg. 1995 Nov;61(11):980-3.
5
Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.腹部缝合时使用慢吸收与快吸收、抗菌涂层缝线,哪种缝线导致切口疝的风险更低?
Surgery. 2012 Mar;151(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
6
A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.一项关于单丝可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线用于腹壁闭合的前瞻性对比临床研究。
Acta Chir Belg. 1989 Sep-Oct;89(5):265-70.
7
[Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies].[比较3种慢吸收缝线用于脐上正中剖腹术缝合的对照试验结果]
Ann Chir. 1995;49(6):544-8.
8
Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.复杂/高风险剖腹手术中改良的腹部正中切口关闭技术
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jan;20(1):37-41.
9
Closure of the abdominal wall after major gastrointestinal operations.大型胃肠道手术后腹壁的关闭。
Eur J Surg. 1996 Apr;162(4):349.
10
Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors.伤口裂开修复术后切口疝:发病率及危险因素
Am Surg. 2004 Apr;70(4):281-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy using the open method is associated with reduced surgical site infection after emergency lower gastrointestinal surgery: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score analyses.开放性预防性负压伤口治疗与急诊下消化道手术后手术部位感染的减少相关:一项倾向评分分析的回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e43099. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043099.
2
Laparoscopic or Robotically Assisted Colectomy with a Pfannenstiel Incision Reduces the Incisional Hernia Incidence.采用耻骨上横切口的腹腔镜或机器人辅助结肠切除术可降低切口疝的发生率。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):298-304. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-019. eCollection 2024.
3
Significance of Specimen Extraction Site in Minimizing Hernia Risk After Distal Pancreatectomy.
标本提取部位对于降低远端胰腺切除术后疝风险的意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8688-8698. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16096-w. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
The clinical consequences of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy: a prospective, observational cohort study.急诊中线剖腹术后发生腹部爆裂的临床后果:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1861-1870. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03104-x. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
Diet and risk for hernia: a Mendelian randomization analysis.饮食与疝气风险:孟德尔随机化分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Jun 18;11:1265920. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1265920. eCollection 2024.
6
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy following colorectal perforation: defining the risk factors for delayed wound healing.结直肠穿孔后预防性负压伤口治疗:延迟伤口愈合的危险因素分析。
Surg Today. 2023 Jun;53(6):728-735. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02631-3. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
7
Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial.初次急诊中线剖腹术后连续与间断腹壁关闭术(CONIAC 试验):一项随机对照单中心试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e059709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059709.
8
Abdominal fascia dehiscence: is there a connection to a special microbial spectrum?腹壁筋膜裂开:与特殊微生物谱有关吗?
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02679-7. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Risk factors of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with periumbilical minilaparotomy incision: a propensity score matching analysis.经脐小切口腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口疝的危险因素:倾向评分匹配分析
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Mar 15;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.1.24.
10
PROPHYlactic Implantation of BIOlogic Mesh in peritonitis (PROPHYBIOM): a prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial.预防性植入生物补片在腹膜炎中的应用(PROPHYBIOM):一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06103-4.