Suppr超能文献

中线剖腹术还是横切口剖腹术?一项随机对照临床试验。第一部分:对愈合的影响。

Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: Influence on healing.

作者信息

Greenall M J, Evans M, Pollock A V

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1980 Mar;67(3):188-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670308.

Abstract

Five hundred and seventy-nine patients undergoing major laparotomy were randomly allocated to have midline or transverse incisions. Transverse incisions took longer to make and caused more bleeding but (in the absence of wound sepsis) no transverse wound burst and there were only 2 incisional hernias. In the midline group, without wound sepsis, there were 2 burst abdomens and 9 incisional hernias. When, however, those patients who suffered wound sepsis were also considered, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

摘要

579例行大剖腹手术的患者被随机分配接受正中切口或横切口。横切口所需时间更长且出血更多,但(在无伤口感染的情况下)没有横切口裂开,仅有2例切口疝。在正中切口组,无伤口感染时,有2例腹部裂开和9例切口疝。然而,当把那些发生伤口感染的患者也考虑在内时,两组之间没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验