• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中线剖腹术还是横切口剖腹术?一项随机对照临床试验。第一部分:对愈合的影响。

Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: Influence on healing.

作者信息

Greenall M J, Evans M, Pollock A V

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1980 Mar;67(3):188-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670308.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800670308
PMID:6988033
Abstract

Five hundred and seventy-nine patients undergoing major laparotomy were randomly allocated to have midline or transverse incisions. Transverse incisions took longer to make and caused more bleeding but (in the absence of wound sepsis) no transverse wound burst and there were only 2 incisional hernias. In the midline group, without wound sepsis, there were 2 burst abdomens and 9 incisional hernias. When, however, those patients who suffered wound sepsis were also considered, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

摘要

579例行大剖腹手术的患者被随机分配接受正中切口或横切口。横切口所需时间更长且出血更多,但(在无伤口感染的情况下)没有横切口裂开,仅有2例切口疝。在正中切口组,无伤口感染时,有2例腹部裂开和9例切口疝。然而,当把那些发生伤口感染的患者也考虑在内时,两组之间没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: Influence on healing.中线剖腹术还是横切口剖腹术?一项随机对照临床试验。第一部分:对愈合的影响。
Br J Surg. 1980 Mar;67(3):188-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670308.
2
Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions.缝线长度与伤口长度之比及正中剖腹手术切口的愈合情况。
Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1284-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801020.
3
Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision.上腹部手术后切口疝:中线切口与横向切口的随机对照试验
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0469-7. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
4
Does mass closure of midline laparotomies stand the test of time? A random control clinical trial.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 May;67(3):159-61.
5
Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications.腹部切口:技术与术后并发症
Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):315-21. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100401.
6
Vertical abdominal incisions--a choice?垂直腹部切口——一种选择?
Br J Surg. 1980 Jun;67(6):395-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670605.
7
Circumumbilical versus transumbilical abdominal incision.
Br J Surg. 1987 Sep;74(9):822-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740923.
8
Transverse abdominal incisions compared with midline incisions for elective infrarenal aortic reconstruction: predisposition to incisional hernia in patients with increased intraoperative blood loss.择期肾下腹主动脉重建术横腹切口与正中切口的比较:术中失血增加患者发生切口疝的易感性
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Jul;20(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90172-4.
9
Towards no incisional hernias: lateral paramedian versus midline incisions.迈向无切口疝:旁正中切口与正中切口的比较
J R Soc Med. 1986 Dec;79(12):711-2. doi: 10.1177/014107688607901208.
10
Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.垂直腹壁关闭的自然史:普理灵与聚乙醇酸缝线的比较
Can J Surg. 1989 May;32(3):196-200.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of transverse versus midline periumbilical incision on incisional hernia and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜结肠癌手术后横向与脐周中线切口对切口疝及短期结局的影响:多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf062.
2
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society.中线切口疝指南:欧洲疝学会
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284.
3
Transverse Incision for Pancreatoduodenectomy Reduces Wound Complications: A Single-Center Analysis of 399 Patients.
胰十二指肠切除术的横向切口可减少伤口并发症:399例患者的单中心分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 10;12(8):2800. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082800.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center.在一个未开展过腹腔镜手术的中心进行的腹腔镜与开放根治性膀胱切除术的随机对照试验。
Adv Urol. 2021 Jul 7;2021:4731013. doi: 10.1155/2021/4731013. eCollection 2021.
5
Abdominal wall sonography: a pictorial review.腹壁超声检查:影像学综述。
J Ultrasound. 2020 Sep;23(3):265-278. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00435-0. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron.腹部前侧切口后腹直肌萎缩:正中切口与倒V形切口对比
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):619-622. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1593-z. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
7
Lateral incisional hernia after renal transplantation: a comparative study.肾移植术后侧方切口疝:一项对比研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):2791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2689-6.
8
Lateral incisional hernia repair by the retromuscular approach with polyester standard mesh: topographic considerations and long-term follow-up of 61 consecutive patients.聚酯标准网经肌后入路修补外侧切口疝:61 例连续患者的解剖学考虑和长期随访。
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):538-44. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1857-9.
9
Incisional hernia recurrence through genomic profiling: a pilot study.通过基因组分析预测切口疝复发:一项初步研究。
Hernia. 2013 Apr;17(2):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0923-4. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection.腹腔镜结肠切除术后经中线取出时,症状性切口疝的发生率较高。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3180-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2311-7. Epub 2012 May 12.