Wöstmann Bernd, Rehmann Peter, Balkenhol Markus
Department of Prosthodontics, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):158-60.
This study aimed to analyze the accuracy resulting from dual-arch impressions when compared to conventional impressions in complex preparations (ie, inlay and partial crown). One hundred eighty impressions were made using two different dual-arch trays; conventional trays served as the control. The accuracy of the dies obtained (Fuji-Rock EP, GC Europe) was assessed indirectly from the change of 59 transversal dimensions. Statistical analysis (t test, analysis of variance) revealed that less rigid dual-arch trays performed better than rigid ones. Though the inlay preparation was more difficult to reproduce with dual-arch trays, it can be concluded that the accuracy obtainable with nonrigid dual-arch trays is comparable to impressions taken from full-arch trays.
本研究旨在分析与传统印模相比,双牙弓印模在复杂修复体(即嵌体和部分冠)制备中产生的准确性。使用两种不同的双牙弓托盘制作了180个印模;传统托盘作为对照。通过59个横向尺寸的变化间接评估所获得模型(富士罗克EP,GC欧洲公司)的准确性。统计分析(t检验、方差分析)表明,刚性较小的双牙弓托盘比刚性较大的托盘表现更好。虽然使用双牙弓托盘复制嵌体修复体更困难,但可以得出结论,非刚性双牙弓托盘可获得的准确性与全牙弓托盘制取的印模相当。