Friesen Craig A, Neilan Nancy A, Schurman Jennifer V, Taylor Debra L, Kearns Gregory L, Abdel-Rahman Susan M
The Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 May 11;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-32.
BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated the clinical efficacy of montelukast in a randomized double-blind controlled cross-over trial in patients with dyspepsia in association with duodenal eosinophilia. The mechanism of this clinical response is unknown but could involve a decrease in eosinophil density or activation. METHODS: Twenty-four dyspeptic patients 8-17 years of age underwent initial blood sampling and endoscopy with biopsy. Eighteen of these patients had elevated duodenal eosinophil density and underwent repeat blood sampling and endoscopy following 21 days of therapy with montelukast (10 mg/day). The following were determined: global clinical response on a 5-point Lickert-type scale, eosinophil density utilizing H & E staining, eosinophil activation determined by degranulation indices on electron microscopy, and serum cytokine concentrations. On day 21, pharmacokinetics and duodenal mucosal drug concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of the patients had a positive clinical response to montelukast with regard to relief of pain with 50% having a complete or nearly complete clinical response. The response was unrelated to systemic drug exposure or to mucosal drug concentration. Other than a mild decrease in eosinophil density in the second portion of the duodenum, there were no significant changes in eosinophil density, eosinophil activation, or serum cytokine concentrations following treatment with montelukast. Pre-treatment TNF-alpha concentration was negatively correlated with clinical response. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical response to montelukast does not appear to result from changes in eosinophil density or activation. Whether the effect is mediated through specific mediators or non-inflammatory cells such as enteric nerves remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00148603.
背景:我们之前在一项针对伴有十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多的消化不良患者的随机双盲对照交叉试验中证实了孟鲁司特的临床疗效。这种临床反应的机制尚不清楚,但可能涉及嗜酸性粒细胞密度或活性的降低。 方法:24名8至17岁的消化不良患者接受了初始血液采样和内镜活检。其中18名患者十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞密度升高,在接受孟鲁司特(10毫克/天)治疗21天后接受了重复血液采样和内镜检查。测定了以下指标:采用5分制李克特量表评估总体临床反应、利用苏木精和伊红染色测定嗜酸性粒细胞密度、通过电子显微镜下的脱颗粒指数测定嗜酸性粒细胞活性以及血清细胞因子浓度。在第21天,测定了药代动力学和十二指肠黏膜药物浓度。 结果:83%的患者在疼痛缓解方面对孟鲁司特有阳性临床反应,其中50%有完全或近乎完全的临床反应。该反应与全身药物暴露或黏膜药物浓度无关。除十二指肠第二部嗜酸性粒细胞密度略有降低外,孟鲁司特治疗后嗜酸性粒细胞密度、嗜酸性粒细胞活性或血清细胞因子浓度均无显著变化。治疗前肿瘤坏死因子-α浓度与临床反应呈负相关。 结论:孟鲁司特的短期临床反应似乎并非由嗜酸性粒细胞密度或活性的变化所致。其作用是否通过特定介质或非炎性细胞(如肠神经)介导仍有待确定。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT00148603。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004-3
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2005
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002-9
Front Neurosci. 2022-4-26
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022-11
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2021-7-30
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019-6-5
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018-9-29
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018-10-1
Aust Prescr. 2017-12
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016-7-30
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007-10
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006-6
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006-6
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006-1
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005-10
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005-9